Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023PD44-04 AGE ASSOCIATED CHANGES TO HEALTH RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE AFTER RADICAL CYSTECTOMY: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY Kelly R. Pekala, Daniel Sjoberg, New York, NY, Matthew B. Clements, MA Burlington, Benjamin Beech, Thomas Atkinson, Yuelin Li, Andrew Vickers, Harry Herr, S. Machele Donat, Amy Tin, Guido Dalbagni, and Bernard H. Bochner Kelly R. PekalaKelly R. Pekala More articles by this author , Daniel SjobergDaniel Sjoberg More articles by this author , New YorkNew York More articles by this author , NY NY More articles by this author , Matthew B. ClementsMatthew B. Clements More articles by this author , MA BurlingtonMA Burlington More articles by this author , Benjamin BeechBenjamin Beech More articles by this author , Thomas AtkinsonThomas Atkinson More articles by this author , Yuelin LiYuelin Li More articles by this author , Andrew VickersAndrew Vickers More articles by this author , Harry HerrHarry Herr More articles by this author , S. Machele DonatS. Machele Donat More articles by this author , Amy TinAmy Tin More articles by this author , Guido DalbagniGuido Dalbagni More articles by this author , and Bernard H. BochnerBernard H. Bochner More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003354.04AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: We previously documented the changes and recovery of Health Related Quality of Life (HR-QoL) after Radical Cystectomy (RC), the gold standard for high-risk invasive bladder cancer. The concern that elderly patients may have a poor QoL after RC may lead both patients and clinicians to avoid definitive surgery despite its oncologic benefits. Our objective was to examine post-RC HR-QoL and how it changes with increasing age. METHODS: To better characterize HR-QoL impacts of RC, we conducted a prospective study with 14 validated patient reported outcome measures of interest to invasive bladder cancer patients. Herein, we describe HR-QoL recovery after RC by patient age at surgery. Locally-weighted polynomial linear regression was utilized to estimate the relationship between age and subsequent QoL. QoL measures were assessed at 3 and 12 months after surgery to assess early and later effects on HRQOL and maximize the number of evaluable patients. RESULTS: We did not find any significant (>10 points) age-associated differences on the EORTC QLQ-C30 domains, which are rated on a 0-100 scale (i.e., global QoL, role functioning, cognitive functioning). (Figure 1) Of the differences that approached clinical significance, at 12 months, older patients reported slightly worse physical functioning and fatigue, with a mean physical functioning QoL score of 83 (95% CI 79-86) for a 80-year-old compared to 93 (95% CI 90-96) for a 60-year-old and a mean fatigue score of 28 (95% CI 23-33) for a 80-year-old compared to 18 (95% CI 14-23) for a 60-year old. Using the EORTC BLM-30, we found no major age-related differences in body image or urostomy issues, and a moderate difference in urinary functioning, which is only rated for continent diversions. Regardless of the age at RC, the satisfaction with life and mental health scores are stable at the 12-month time point. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study demonstrates that older patients selected for RC do not report major decreases to HR-QoL after surgery compared to younger patients. While changes in activity levels and fatigue are mildly greater in the oldest group, overall QoL recovered in a similar fashion to younger patients. Geriatric patients selected for RC have a similar QoL post-RC compared to their younger counterparts and should not be counseled against RC based on QoL concerns alone. Source of Funding: This work was supported by the Sidney Kimmel Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, the National Cancer Institute Cancer Center Core grant number P30-CA008748, Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award T32CA082088, and the Pin Down Bladder Cancer Fund © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e1125 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Kelly R. Pekala More articles by this author Daniel Sjoberg More articles by this author New York More articles by this author NY More articles by this author Matthew B. Clements More articles by this author MA Burlington More articles by this author Benjamin Beech More articles by this author Thomas Atkinson More articles by this author Yuelin Li More articles by this author Andrew Vickers More articles by this author Harry Herr More articles by this author S. Machele Donat More articles by this author Amy Tin More articles by this author Guido Dalbagni More articles by this author Bernard H. Bochner More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.