Abstract

Soundscapes pose both evolutionarily recent and long-standing sources of selection on acoustic communication. We currently know more about the impact of evolutionarily recent human-generated noise on communication than we do about how natural sounds such as pounding surf have shaped communication signals over evolutionary time. Based on signal detection theory, we hypothesized that acoustic phenotypes will vary with both anthropogenic and natural background noise levels and that similar mechanisms of cultural evolution and/or behavioral flexibility may underlie this variation. We studied song characteristics of white-crowned sparrows (Zonotrichia leucophrys nuttalli) across a noise gradient that includes both anthropogenic and natural sources of noise in San Francisco and Marin counties, California, USA. Both anthropogenic and natural soundscapes contain high amplitude low frequency noise (traffic or surf, respectively), so we predicted that birds would produce songs with higher minimum frequencies in areas with higher amplitude background noise to avoid auditory masking. We also anticipated that song minimum frequencies would be higher than the projected lower frequency limit of hearing based on site-specific masking profiles. Background noise was a strong predictor of song minimum frequency, both within a local noise gradient of three urban sites with the same song dialect and cultural evolutionary history, and across the regional noise gradient, which encompasses 11 urban and rural sites, several dialects, and several anthropogenic and natural sources of noise. Among rural sites alone, background noise tended to predict song minimum frequency, indicating that urban sites were not solely responsible for driving the regional pattern. These findings support the hypothesis that songs vary with local and regional soundscapes regardless of the source of noise. Song minimum frequency from five core study sites was also higher than the lower frequency limit of hearing at each site, further supporting the hypothesis that songs vary to transmit through noise in local soundscapes. Minimum frequencies leveled off at noisier sites, suggesting that minimum frequencies are constrained to an upper limit, possibly to retain the information content of wider bandwidths. We found evidence that site noise was a better predictor of song minimum frequency than territory noise in both anthropogenic and natural soundscapes, suggesting that cultural evolution rather than immediate behavioral flexibility is responsible for local song variation. Taken together, these results indicate that soundscapes shape song phenotype across both evolutionarily recent and long-standing soundscapes.

Highlights

  • The soundscape includes all sounds in a landscape [1] and is the backdrop against which all acoustic communication takes place

  • Many species of birds produce songs with higher minimum frequencies in urban areas compared to rural areas, presumably to be heard over the high amplitude, low frequency noise generated by machines [11, 12, 15,16,17,18,19,20,21]

  • Background noise levels for both urban and rural sites corresponded to noise profiles measured by the National Park Service (NPS) Natural Sounds Program which monitored background noise level at two sites near our urban and rural areas for 30 days each (55.5 dBA and 44.9 dBA respectively [63, 64])

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The soundscape includes all sounds in a landscape [1] and is the backdrop against which all acoustic communication takes place. This backdrop can pose limitations when noise masks (i.e., limits perception of) signals used in communication [2]. We measured background noise levels at each territory following the methods developed by Brumm [48]. To calibrate the sound pressure levels in each noise recording, we simultaneously measured the maximum sound pressure twice at each of the four compass points for 10s, for a total of eight values per territory. To estimate the average noise per site, we averaged all LAeq values per site

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.