Abstract

ObjectiveThe oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) classifies subjects as normal, glucose intolerant or diabetic depending on glycemia at 120 min (T120) post-test. Five insulin profiles associated with different incidences of diabetes over 10 years’ follow-up were previously described following OGTT. However, insulin measurement is sensitive to hemolysis, and can be replaced by C-peptide assay on hemolyzed samples. However, little is known about patterns of C-peptide response to OGTT. Design and methodsIn total, 128 patients were included, to establish preliminary baseline C-peptide values and to evaluate C-peptide response to OGTT in comparison to insulin response, using the Liaison XL immunoanalyzer. ResultsHundred patients had a normal glycemic response, 19 were classified as glucose intolerant and 9 as diabetic. In normal subjects, median C-peptide values (nmol/L, with 5–95 percentiles) were 0.53 (0.23–1.37) at baseline, peaking at 2.36 (0.94–1.83) at T60, and decreasing to 2.09 (1.13–4.36) at T120. The C-peptide response pattern was similar but flatter than the insulin pattern because of different catabolism pathways. Nevertheless, C-peptide and insulin response profiles were discordant in only 9.4% of cases. Profile 3 (C-peptide peaking at T60) was the most prevalent in normal patients whereas profile 4 (peak at 120 min and lower level at T30 than at T60) was the most prevalent in glucose intolerant and diabetic patients. ConclusionsIn OGTT, C-peptide could replace insulin determination on hemolyzed blood samples to predict the risk of type 2 diabetes.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.