Abstract
The US FDA has advocated the patient-reported outcome (PRO) draft guidance as the main vehicle for evaluating PRO-based labeling claims for oncology drugs. In addition, FDA-affiliated researchers have identified factors inhibiting acceptance of health-related quality of life (HRQoL)-based claims for oncology product labels. The views of the FDA on PRO claims are extensive and prescriptive. By contrast, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has conducted authorizations without an explicitly defined approach for evaluating HRQoL data. A reflective paper released in 2005 offered only broad recommendations on HRQoL labeling claims. The different approaches between the two regulatory agencies partly stem from underlying, divergent organizational characteristics. Moreover, general issues inherent in PRO research in oncology trials including trial design, missing data, multiplicity of end points and inconsistent findings of HRQoL data are discussed.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
