PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES AFTER ELECTIVE REVISION TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY IN ELDERLY PATIENTS (>85 YEARS)

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionRevision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) in elderly patients (>85 years) is associated with increased mortality, hospital stay and a high rate (55%) of complications. The objective was to assess PROMs in elderly patients undergoing rTKA.MethodsA retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing rTKA at an arthroplasty centre from 2001–2022 were compared to a control group (aged 50–79y) matched for gender, diagnosis & surgery year. The commonest reasons for revision in elderly patients was aseptic loosening (53/100), infection (21/100) and fracture (7/100). One-year patient-reported outcome data was available for 64%.Results100 patients underwent rTKA with a mean age of 84 years (range 80–97 years, SD 3) compared to a matched control group of younger patients (mean age 69y). Preoperative function was poor, with a mean Oxford knee score (OKS) of 40/100 in elderly and 43/100 in younger patients (p=0.164).At one-year postop, mean OKS was comparable between elderly and young patients (81 and 84/100 respectively, p=0.289). The number of patients with severe pain at one year was also comparable (4% elderly and 7% young respectively, p=0.177).The improvement in OKS for elderly patients was sustained at three (82 95% CI 58–100, 14/100 known) and five years.Overall complication rate was 54%. 14% were dead at 1 year and 56% were dead at five-years.ConclusionElderly patients undergoing elective revision TKA show a mean improvement in Oxford knee score of +38 at one year. This is the same as younger patients and is sustained at three and five years.