Abstract
As part of a global trend, police forces across Canada have recently piloted or debated policies for the use of body and dash cameras. Extensive studies by two of Canada’s largest police forces have recommended adopting cameras, and copious scholarship has supported their potential for improving police accountability and trial efficiency. Yet, few police forces in Canada have formally adopted a policy to use cameras. Courts in recent cases have refused to recognize a right to police camera evidence under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, pursuant to either the disclosure requirements of sections 7 and 11(d), or the scope of what constitutes a search carried out in a reasonable manner under section 8. But judges in other cases have decried the failure by police to use camera evidence to assist in prosecution. Recent deliberations within the RCMP, Toronto, and other police forces in Canada point to cost as an obstacle. This article surveys these developments to lend context for the argument that Parliament could foster greater uniformity in the adoption and use of police cameras and more efficient prosecutions — without unduly interfering in local funding decisions — by legislating a requirement that police use cameras in discrete situations, including arrest and detention, vehicle stops for Criminal Code offences, and residential searches.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
