Abstract
Net zero emissions targets are of growing international relevance given their increasing uptake by governments across the world. This article analyses net zero targets as a distinctly future-oriented approach to environmental governance. It does so from a critical perspective, examining whether net zero targets serve to reproduce the existing temporalities of environmental policymaking or whether they represent a break with current practices and, in turn, develop new temporalities and novel ways of engaging with the future. In order to do this, this article focuses on efforts to reduce agricultural emissions in England to net zero. In 2019 the United Kingdom introduced legislation requiring a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions to net zero by 2050. This, in turn, has encouraged actors in the food system to produce various imagined pathways to net-zero agriculture. This article critically analyses how these imagined pathways are discursively produced by influential actors within this sphere through a critical discourse analysis of recent grey literature produced by Defra, the Climate Change Committee and the National Farmers’ Union. It asserts that, to an extent, the net zero and target oriented approaches enshrined in current environmental policymaking represent the ongoing reproduction of both an ‘empty’ modernist future with some post-political dimensions. This assessment is, however, nuanced by recognising the tensions that emerge within and between the state and non-state institutions producing these discourses. Ultimately, however, the net zero transition draws actors together around a techno-optimistic vision of an agricultural future defined by sustainable intensification and negative emissions technologies. In doing so, it serves to suppress calls for transformative change in agriculture based on social as well as material change.
Highlights
Target-oriented ‘net zero’ approaches towards greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction are of growing international significance as a mode of environmental governance
This article critically analyses how these imagined pathways are discursively produced by influential actors within this sphere through a critical discourse analysis of recent grey literature produced by Defra, the Climate Change Committee and the National Farmers’ Union
As part of research encompassing a broader array of texts of varying type, provenance, and length I performed Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) on documents produced by the Climate Change Committee (CCC), notably their report Land Use: Policies for a Net Zero United Kingdom (UK) (2020), the National Farmers’ Union (NFU) (2019, 2020) and recent publications by Defra (2019a, 2019b, 2020a, 2020b, 2020c, 2020d, 2020e)
Summary
Target-oriented ‘net zero’ approaches towards greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction are of growing international significance as a mode of environmental governance. Those who are deemed responsible for shared societal futures operate in a context blind to the long-term environmental impacts of their actions This includes the institutions of liberal democratic government that rely on science, law and economics, knowledge practices which are not “fully equipped to deal with the futures of their making, and are limited in their contributions to the understanding, administration and regulation of the temporal realm” (Adam and Groves, 2007: 116). As for the governmental context of net zero targets for agricultural emissions, existing literature looking at UK targets in the context of transport has dismissed such approaches as ‘symbolic metapolicy’ (Bache et al, 2015) This policy-oriented scholarship, lacks a substantive critical foundation or an analysis of the spatio-temporality of such approaches. These strategic relational or neo-Gramscian approaches are compatible with the methodological approach which shaped this research, to which this article turns
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.