Pathological macroscopic evaluation of breast density versus mammographic breast density in breast cancer conserving surgery

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

Correlation between imaging and anatomopathological breast density has been superficially explored and is heterogeneous in current medical literature. It is possible that mammographic and pathological findings are divergent. The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between breast density classified by mammography and breast density of pathological macroscopic examination in specimens of breast cancer conservative surgeries. Post-hoc, exploratory analysis of a prospective randomized clinical trial of patients with breast cancer candidates for breast conservative surgery. Breast mammographic density (MD) was analyzed according to ACR BI-RADS® criteria, and pathologic macroscopic evaluation of breast density (PMBD) was estimated by visually calculating the ratio between stromal and fatty tissue. From 412 patients, MD was A in 291 (70,6%), B in 80 (19,4%) B, C in 35 (8,5%), and D in 6 (1,5%). Ninety-nine percent (201/203) of patients classified as A+B in MD were correspondently classified in PMBD. Conversely, only 18.7% (39/209) of patients with MD C+D were classified correspondently in PMBD (p < 0.001). Binary logistic regression showed age (OR 1.06, 1.01–1.12 95% CI, p 0.013) and nulliparity (OR 0.39, 0.17–0.96 95% CI, p 0.039) as predictors of A+B PMBD. ConclusionMammographic and pathologic macroscopic breast density showed no association in our study for breast C or D in breast image. The fatty breast was associated with older patients and the nulliparity decreases the chance of fatty breasts nearby 60%.