Abstract

The article by Hollingsworth and Mabry that appears in this issue of theJournal(p 148) provides interesting and important supplemental information to the authors' earlier article. 1 These articles present convincing evidence that at least some cases of congenital Graves disease (perhaps 20% to 30%) are not transient and emphasize that the disease is not benign. The mortality is in the range of 15% to 20%, and sequels, including premature synostosis and minimal brain dysfunction, are common, particularly in the cases with a persistent or recurrent course. The authors suggest that the neonatal disease is not due to transplacentally acquired long-acting thyroid stimulator (LATS), but rather that the LATS serves only as an immunologic marker or incitant in a genetically preselected population. This is a provocative hypothesis and seems credible for the infants with prolonged disease (more than six months). However, for those with transient disease of less than

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.