Passivity-Based Iterative Learning Control for Spacecraft Attitude Tracking on SO(3)

  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • Similar Papers
Abstract
Translate article icon Translate Article Star icon
Take notes icon Take Notes

Passivity-Based Iterative Learning Control for Spacecraft Attitude Tracking on SO(3)

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 448
  • 10.1137/1006093
On the Parametrization of the Three-Dimensional Rotation Group
  • Oct 1, 1964
  • SIAM Review
  • John Stuelpnagel

Parameterization of group of rotations of Euclidean three-dimensional space applied to integration of rigid body motion equations

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 56
  • 10.2514/1.g005010
Distributed Cooperative Guidance for Multivehicle Simultaneous Arrival Without Numerical Singularities
  • Apr 23, 2020
  • Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics
  • Kang Li + 4 more

Distributed Cooperative Guidance for Multivehicle Simultaneous Arrival Without Numerical Singularities

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 3
  • 10.2514/1.g007097
Distributed Optimization Method for Spacecraft Attitude Control and Vibration Suppression
  • Jan 31, 2023
  • Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics
  • Yabo Hu + 2 more

Distributed Optimization Method for Spacecraft Attitude Control and Vibration Suppression

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 29
  • 10.2514/1.g005065
Consensus-Based Cooperative Geometrical Rules for Simultaneous Target Interception
  • Aug 13, 2020
  • Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics
  • Benjamin Zadka + 3 more

Consensus-Based Cooperative Geometrical Rules for Simultaneous Target Interception

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 19
  • 10.2514/1.g004424
Nonlinear Simultaneous Interception Guidance Strategies for Stationary Targets
  • Oct 17, 2019
  • Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics
  • Rohit V Nanavati + 2 more

Nonlinear Simultaneous Interception Guidance Strategies for Stationary Targets

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 26
  • 10.2514/1.g005822
Adaptive Formation Tracking Control of Directed Networked Vehicles in a Time-Varying Flowfield
  • Jun 9, 2021
  • Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics
  • Yang-Yang Chen + 2 more

Adaptive Formation Tracking Control of Directed Networked Vehicles in a Time-Varying Flowfield

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 32
  • 10.2514/1.g005455
Terminal Time-Constrained Nonlinear Interception Strategies Against Maneuvering Targets
  • Aug 27, 2020
  • Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics
  • Shashi Ranjan Kumar + 1 more

Terminal Time-Constrained Nonlinear Interception Strategies Against Maneuvering Targets

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 64
  • 10.2514/1.g004681
Three-Dimensional Cooperative Homing Guidance Law with Field-of-View Constraint
  • Oct 28, 2019
  • Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics
  • Yadong Chen + 4 more

Three-Dimensional Cooperative Homing Guidance Law with Field-of-View Constraint

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 2
  • 10.2514/1.g007398
Switched Control of Fixed-Wing Aircraft for Continuous Airdrop of Heavy Payloads
  • Jun 1, 2023
  • Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics
  • Lixian Zhang + 4 more

Switched Control of Fixed-Wing Aircraft for Continuous Airdrop of Heavy Payloads

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 3
  • 10.2514/1.g006934
Integrated Reconfiguration Mechanism for Quadrotors with Capability Analysis Against Rotor Failure
  • Nov 30, 2022
  • Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics
  • Xiang Yu + 4 more

Integrated Reconfiguration Mechanism for Quadrotors with Capability Analysis Against Rotor Failure

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 46
  • 10.2514/1.g002314
Two Approaches for Path Planning of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles with Avoidance Zones
  • May 29, 2017
  • Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics
  • Chuangchuang Sun + 3 more

Two Approaches for Path Planning of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles with Avoidance Zones

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 61
  • 10.2514/1.62308
Collision Probability with Gaussian Mixture Orbit Uncertainty
  • Feb 12, 2014
  • Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics
  • Kyle J Demars + 2 more

Collision Probability with Gaussian Mixture Orbit Uncertainty

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 59
  • 10.2514/1.58558
Geometric Integration of Quaternions
  • Feb 5, 2013
  • Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics
  • Michael S Andrle + 1 more

Geometric Integration of Quaternions

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 5
  • 10.2514/1.g006882
Optimal Midcourse Guidance for Dual-Pulse Rocket Using Pseudospectral Sequential Convex Programming
  • May 24, 2023
  • Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics
  • Boseok Kim + 1 more

No AccessEngineering NotesOptimal Midcourse Guidance for Dual-Pulse Rocket Using Pseudospectral Sequential Convex ProgrammingBoseok Kim and Chang-Hun LeeBoseok Kim https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8897-2418Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea and Chang-Hun Lee https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0758-1974Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon 34141, Republic of KoreaPublished Online:26 May 2023https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G006882SectionsRead Now ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationTrack citations About References [1] Cheng V. H. L. and Gupta N. K., "Advanced Midcourse Guidance for Air-to-Air Missiles," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1986, pp. 135–142. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20081 LinkGoogle Scholar[2] Sridhar B. and Gupta N. K., "Missile Guidance Laws Based on Singular Perturbation Methodology," Journal of Guidance and Control, Vol. 3, No. 2, 1980, pp. 158–165. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.55964 LinkGoogle Scholar[3] Menon P. K. A. and Briggs M. M., "Near-Optimal Midcourse Guidance for Air-to-Air Missiles," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 13, No. 4, 1990, pp. 596–602. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.25375 LinkGoogle Scholar[4] Manickavasagam M., Sarkar A. K. and Vaithiyanathan V., "A Singular Perturbation Based Midcourse Guidance Law for Realistic Air-to-air Engagement," Defence Science Journal, Vol. 67, No. 1, 2017, pp. 108–118. https://doi.org/10.14429/dsj.1.9236 Google Scholar[5] Imado F., Kuroda T. and Miwa S., "Optimal Midcourse Guidance for Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missiles," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 13, No. 4, 1990, pp. 603–608. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.25376 LinkGoogle Scholar[6] Kumar R. R., Seywald H. and Cliff E. M., "Near-Optimal Three-Dimensional Air-to-Air Missile Guidance Against Maneuvering Target," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 18, No. 3, 1995, pp. 457–464. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.21409 LinkGoogle Scholar[7] Cheng V. H. L., Menon P. K. A., Gupta N. K. and Briggs M. M., "Reduced-Order Pulse-Motor Ignition Control Logic," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 10, No. 4, 1987, pp. 343–350. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20224 LinkGoogle Scholar[8] Annam C., Ratnoo A. and Ghose D., "Singular-Perturbation-Based Guidance of Pulse Motor Interceptors with Look Angle Constraints," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 44, No. 7, 2021, pp. 1356–1370. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G005508 LinkGoogle Scholar[9] Calise A. J. and Nagy J., "Necessary Conditions for Optimal Pulse Control," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 9, No. 1, 1986, pp. 53–57. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20066 LinkGoogle Scholar[10] Calise A. J. and Prasad J. V. R., "Pulse Motor Control for Maximizing Average Velocity," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 12, No. 2, 1989, pp. 169–174. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20387 LinkGoogle Scholar[11] Imado F., Kuroda T. and Miwa S., "Optimal Thrust Control of a Missile with a Pulse Motor," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 14, No. 2, 1991, pp. 377–382. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20649 LinkGoogle Scholar[12] Lu P., "Introducing Computational Guidance and Control," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 40, No. 2, 2017, pp. 193–193. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G002745 LinkGoogle Scholar[13] Liu X., Shen Z. and Lu P., "Entry Trajectory Optimization by Second-Order Cone Programming," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 2, 2016, pp. 227–241. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001210 LinkGoogle Scholar[14] Wang Z. and Grant M. J., "Constrained Trajectory Optimization for Planetary Entry via Sequential Convex Programming," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 40, No. 10, 2017, pp. 2603–2615. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G002150 LinkGoogle Scholar[15] Szmuk M., Eren U. and Acikmese B., "Successive Convexification for Mars 6-DoF Powered Descent Landing Guidance," AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, AIAA Paper 2017-1500, 2017. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2017-1500 LinkGoogle Scholar[16] Liu X., Shen Z. and Lu P., "Exact Convex Relaxation for Optimal Flight of Aerodynamically Controlled Missiles," IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 52, No. 4, 2016, pp. 1881–1892. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2016.150741 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[17] Benedikter B., Zavoli A., Colasurdo G., Pizzurro S. and Cavallini E., "Convex Approach to Three-Dimensional Launch Vehicle Ascent Trajectory Optimization," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 44, No. 6, 2021, pp. 1116–1131. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G005376 LinkGoogle Scholar[18] Liu X., "Fuel-Optimal Rocket Landing with Aerodynamic Controls," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 42, No. 1, 2019, pp. 65–77. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G003537 LinkGoogle Scholar[19] Sagliano M., Heidecker A., Macés Hernández J., Farì S., Schlotterer M., Woicke S., Seelbinder D. and Dumont E., "Onboard Guidance for Reusable Rockets: Aerodynamic Descent and Powered Landing," AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum, AIAA Paper 2021-0862, 2021. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2021-0862 LinkGoogle Scholar[20] Wang J., Zhang R. and Li H., "Onboard Optimization of Multi-Arc Trajectories with Constraints on Duration of Arcs," Acta Astronautica, Vol. 192, March 2022, pp. 434–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.12.023 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[21] Wang Z. and Lu Y., "Improved Sequential Convex Programming Algorithms for Entry Trajectory Optimization," Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 57, No. 6, 2020, pp. 1373–1386. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A34640 LinkGoogle Scholar[22] Wang J. and Cui N., "A Pseudospectral-Convex Optimization Algorithm for Rocket Landing Guidance," 2018 AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, AIAA Paper 2018-1871, 2018. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-1871 LinkGoogle Scholar[23] Liu X., Shen Z. and Lu P., "Solving the Maximum-Crossrange Problem via Successive Second-Order Cone Programming with a Line Search," Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 47, Dec. 2015, pp. 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2015.09.008 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[24] Sagliano M., "Pseudospectral Convex Optimization for Powered Descent and Landing," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 41, No. 2, 2018, pp. 320–334. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G002818 LinkGoogle Scholar[25] Sagliano M. and Mooij E., "Optimal Drag-Energy Entry Guidance via Pseudospectral Convex Optimization," Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 117, Oct. 2021, Paper 106946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2021.106946 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[26] Sagliano M., "Generalized hp Pseudospectral-Convex Programming for Powered Descent and Landing," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 42, No. 7, 2019, pp. 1562–1570. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G003731 LinkGoogle Scholar[27] Lei X., Hongbo Z., Xiang Z. and Guojian T., "Hp-Adaptive Pseudospectral Convex Optimization for Rocket Powered Landing Trajectory Planning," 2019 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC), IEEE, New York, 2019, pp. 895–900. https://doi.org/10.1109/cac48633.2019.8996784 Google Scholar[28] Zhou X., He R.-Z., Zhang H.-B., Tang G.-J. and Bao W.-M., "Sequential Convex Programming Method Using Adaptive Mesh Refinement for Entry Trajectory Planning Problem," Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 109, Feb. 2021, Paper 106374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.106374 Google Scholar[29] Pei P. and Wang J., "Near-Optimal Guidance with Impact Angle and Velocity Constraints Using Sequential Convex Programming," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Vol. 2019, Oct. 2019, pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2065730 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[30] Garg D., Patterson M., Hager W. W., Rao A. V., Benson D. A. and Huntington G. T., "A Unified Framework for the Numerical Solution of Optimal Control Problems Using Pseudospectral Methods," Automatica, Vol. 46, No. 11, 2010, pp. 1843–1851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2010.06.048 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[31] Kim B., Lee C.-H., Tahk M.-J. and He S., "A New Biased Proportional Navigation Guidance for Decelerating Targets," Advances in Guidance, Navigation and Control, Springer, Singapore, 2022, pp. 2489–2500. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8155-7_209 Google Scholar[32] Nocedal J. and Yuan Y.-X., "Combining Trust Region and Line Search Techniques," Advances in Nonlinear Programming, Springer, Boston, MA, 1998, pp. 153–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3335-7_7 Google Scholar[33] "MOSEK Optimization Toolbox for MATLAB," User's Guide and Reference Manual, Ver. 4, MOSEK ApS, 2019. Google Scholar[34] Patterson M. A. and Rao A. V., "GPOPS-II: A MATLAB Software for Solving Multiple-Phase Optimal Control Problems Using hp-Adaptive Gaussian Quadrature Collocation Methods and Sparse Nonlinear Programming," ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS), Vol. 41, No. 1, 2014, pp. 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1145/2558904 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[35] Dueri D., Açıkmeşe B., Scharf D. P. and Harris M. W., "Customized Real-Time Interior-Point Methods for Onboard Powered-Descent Guidance," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 40, No. 2, 2017, pp. 197–212. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001480 LinkGoogle Scholar Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails What's Popular Articles in Advance CrossmarkInformationCopyright © 2023 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. All rights reserved. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the eISSN 1533-3884 to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp. KeywordsOptimal Midcourse GuidanceDual-pulse RocketConvex ProgrammingComputational GuidanceLong Range Air-to-Air MissileAcknowledgmentsThis work was supported by Theater Defense Research Center funded by Defense Acquisition Program Administration under Grant UD200043CD.PDF Received7 April 2022Accepted16 April 2023Published online26 May 2023

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 6
  • 10.2514/1.g007198
Two-Stage Trajectory Planning for Autonomous Deployment and Target Capture of Space Manipulators
  • Feb 20, 2023
  • Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics
  • Yuanqing Liu + 4 more

Two-Stage Trajectory Planning for Autonomous Deployment and Target Capture of Space Manipulators

Save Icon
Up Arrow
Open/Close
  • Ask R Discovery Star icon
  • Chat PDF Star icon

AI summaries and top papers from 250M+ research sources.