Abstract
This article reports results from a US case study utilising participant‐centred evaluations of government training programmes for the econ‐omically disadvantaged. The study concludes that when qualitative evidence such as open‐ended, face‐to‐face interviews with participants are added to the quantitative evaluation techniques currently used, significantly new or different insights can be gained for policy‐making purposes.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
