Abstract

In the field of conservation, the shift from the fortress conservation approach towards participatory management has considerably increased the interest for tourism activities and income. In Rwanda, the protected areas governance system is promoting community-based conservation through tourism revenue sharing to achieve conservation and development goals. The case study was designed to: (1) assess the understanding and implementation of principles of community participation by different stakeholders for the benefit of local communities and the efficiency of the conservation and (2) define interactive dynamics and conditions created for fully and sustainably population involvement in the conservation. The study area was selected because of its rich biodiversity and the high dependence of surrounding populations on natural resources. The study adopted a qualitative approach based on semi-structured individual interviews to key stakeholders from different categories of stakeholders including local communities. The data collected were transcribed, translated and analyzed using content analysis methods, MAXQDA Software and a coding system. The results showed that the involvement and empowerment of local people are done through keen activities based cooperative associations and funded projects, reference made to resources use, awareness raising and skills for interactions, cooperative spirit promotion and entrepreneurship. They indicated that the level of communities’ participation remains only of procedural kind and is still low though community members are benefiting of jobs, loans for their projects and income generating activities such as organized productions for market thanks to tourism revenue sharing and revolving fund programs. The transfer of the management is slow and smooth because of a slow change of mindset from receiving mentality, farming related difficulties, unaffordable lending conditions and a great deal of communication and misunderstanding on the tourism revenue sharing and the projects funding approaches. Contradictory understandings and appreciations of the community participation are recorded according to the categories of stakeholders. Actually, all the administrative and technical processes including mediation between communities and funding agencies are driven through a top-down management model; the study area being a state owned and controlled park and not a co-managed one. Though local communities gradually understand the role of the park thanks to income generating activities and community projects, the new approach does not meet basic criteria for effective community participation to ensure the sustainability of the conservation. However, the socio-economic incentives have a positive impact on the reduction of illegal activities and threats, except poaching for which a compensation fund for damaged crops was created.

Highlights

  • The nature conservation paradigm started within the protectionism approach which denied the local communities to participate in conservation activities and people to use protected natural resources for their basic needs [1]

  • The present study aimed to examine the community participation in natural resources management by focusing on: (1) how communities understand community participation approach, (2) how they are empowered to participate in conservation, understanding the benefits that they could receive as neighbors of protected areas, challenges that hinder them in participating in natural resources management and strategies to overcome those challenges

  • The study showed that the recent policy of community participation in the management of National Park (NNP) has brought new perspectives and hope for sustainable conservation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The nature conservation paradigm started within the protectionism approach which denied the local communities to participate in conservation activities and people to use protected natural resources for their basic needs [1]. The protectionism approach failed to achieve its goals for many reasons among which a high reliance of local communities to natural resources and a high rate of poverty [5, 6]. Different models of “community based conservation” programs (CBC) linking the conservation to the alleviation of rural poverty through socio-economic welfare initiatives and community participation were undertaken [10], especially in favor of previously neglected people around protected areas [11]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.