Abstract
The behavioral literature contains inconsistent results on the function of sound frequency (pitch) across species, offering an unexplored opportunity to investigate evolutionary diversification of communication systems. I review those results for birds, where about half the studied species use lower than average frequency (LAF) as a relevant sexual signal, and the remaining species use higher than average frequency (HAF) for the same functions. This variation appears nonrandom with respect to putative causal factors, suggesting that advertising body size determines which species use LAF as a sexual signal. I evaluate different hypotheses to explain why the remaining species use HAF instead. Integrating tests of alternative hypotheses on focal species will be required to demonstrate the causes for this divergence in communication systems. Key words: animal communication, body size, motivational–structural rules, receiver psychology, sound frequency, vocal performance. [Behav Ecol]
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
