Abstract
Numerical comparison serves as a major tool in evaluating the performance of optimization algorithms, especially nondeterministic algorithms, but existing methods may suffer from a ‘cycle ranking’ paradox and/or a ‘survival of the non-fittest’ paradox. This paper searches for paradox-free data analysis methods for numerical comparison. It is discovered that a class of sufficient conditions exist for designing paradox-free analysis. Rigorous modeling and deduction are applied to a class of profile methods employing a filter. It is thus further discovered and proven that algorithm-independent filter conditions can prevent cycle ranking and survival of non-fittest paradoxes from occurring. By adopting an algorithm-independent filter, popular profile methods such as the ‘modified data profile method’‘, the accuracy profile method’, and ‘the operational characteristics zones method’ can be paradox free in comparing or benchmarking the performance of optimization algorithms.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
