Abstract
First year mathematics undergraduates entering British universities are often very unprepared for the kind of proof activities that occur throughout undergraduate degree programmes. Their previous experiences of the idea of proof are frequently limited to situations where the ‘proof’ is simply an extended chain of calculations or algebraic manipulations. In fact, this is well-illustrated by their approach to proof by induction, where they can carry out the mechanical details of the inductive step, but have no understanding of why proof by induction works, nor what status the initialisation step and the inductive hypothesis have in the proof. There is no real grasp of what it means to prove that some assertion is true. Much time, in consequence, is spent in the first years of mathematics degree courses up and down the country attempting to bring about this understanding.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
