Abstract
The interesting question ¿What does tense grammar is for?, is answered by Claude Zilberberg with a reflection that captures its theories about tensivity and its function in the production of sense. After a clarification on “language and sense”, he raises the issues of tense grammar, starting with the construction of its own categories: intensity and extensity, mainly, as valences that define and determinate there own values; the interval that regulates the quantity problems; the syntax of intensity and syntax of extensity; to finish with the value problematic, which is always in the sight.
Highlights
SUMMARY: The interesting question ¿What does tense grammar is for?, is answered by Claude Zilberberg with a reflection that captures its theories about tensivity and its function in the production of sense
After a clarification on “language and sense”, he raises the issues of tense grammar, starting with the construction of its own categories: intensity and extensity, mainly, as valences that define and determinate there own values; the interval that regulates the quantity problems; the syntax of intensity and syntax of extensity; to finish with the value problematic, which is always in the sight
Diccionario razonado de la teoría del lenguaje
Summary
Dans le moment même où le langage est ainsi obsedé de lui-même, il lui est donné, comme par surcroît, de nous ouvrir à une signification.*. Desde el punto de vista subjetal, la locución interrogativa: ¿para qué sirve? Desde el punto de vista objetal, la locución: ¿para que sirve? La locución ¿para qué sirve?, si el enunciatario la recibe, se convierte en una invitación al heroísmo, o al ridículo si es que no logra el objetivo que se ha fijado: convencer a su contendor en potencia. El programa propuesto comporta una segunda demanda no modalizada: el lenguaje y el sentido. La segunda demanda: ¿para qué sirve la gramática tensiva? Conlleva una dimensión personal en la medida en que yo he podido contribuir al desarrollo del punto de vista tensivo; en ese sentido, apela a la dimensión argumentativa e intersubjetiva del discurso, puesto que nos enfrentamos siempre a entimemas, es decir, según Aristóteles, a silogismos truncos.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.