Panoramic view of head-and-neck cancer at Western Maharashtra’s rural tertiary cancer care center: A prospective observational study

Head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors often experience distress and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) impairment. Research suggests that rural cancer patients may have poorer outcomes than urban patients. This study examined whether HNC patient emotional and HRQOL outcomes differ in those living in a rural versus urban location at 6 and 12 months postdiagnosis. A total of 261 HNC patients were included from a longitudinal study of HNC outcomes. The majority were diagnosed with advanced stage cancer (51.3%); the most common cancer site was oral cavity (41.0%). Rurality was measured using the US Department of Agriculture Rural Urban Commuting Area codes. Depression was measured using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), general HRQOL using the Short Form-36 (SF-36), and HNC-specific HRQOL using the Head and Neck Cancer Inventory (HNCI). Analyses were 2 (group) × 3 (assessment) repeated measures ANCOVAs, controlling for demographic and clinical characteristics. Approximately 45% of the sample lived in a rural location. Follow-up comparisons of significant overall models indicated that rural patients reported significantly more nonsomatic depression symptoms at 6-month follow-up. Rural patients were also more likely to report significantly poorer general mental HRQOL at 12-month follow-up, significantly poorer HNC-specific HRQOL related to eating at 6- and 12-month follow-up, and marginally worse aesthetics at 12-month follow-up. These findings are consistent with suggestions that rural HNC patients may be at heightened risk for depression symptoms and decrements in HRQOL. Patients should be screened and regularly monitored for issues with depression and HNC-specific HRQOL throughout the survivorship period.

Simple SummaryThe purpose of this research was to investigate the impact of routine assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) on quality of life and satisfaction with care in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). A randomized controlled open-label clinical trial with 200 patients with HNC managed in four cancer centers in Eastern France was performed. In the intervention arm (regularly completed HRQoL questionnaires), HRQoL mean change was significantly improved at 2 years from baseline. Compared with the control arm, differences were not statistically significant, but minimal clinically important differences in favor of the intervention arm were found for HRQoL, satisfaction with waiting times, and satisfaction with accessibility. In patients with head and neck cancer undergoing treatments, routine assessment of HRQoL is a simple practice and may have HRQoL and satisfaction benefits.The impact of routine assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) on satisfaction with care and the HRQoL of patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) treated with radiotherapy was assessed. Patients with HNC were randomly assigned to two arms, with stratification on sex, cancer localization, and stage of the disease. In the intervention arm, the patients completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-H&N35 questionnaires first before randomization, then before each medical appointment during radiotherapy (7 weeks), and then every 3 months until 1 year and at 2 years thereafter. In the control arm, the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-H&N35 questionnaires were completed before randomization and at 1 year and 2 years thereafter. The primary endpoint was mean change in HRQoL at score at 2 years from baseline assessed by EQ VAS from the EuroQol questionnaire. The secondary endpoint was mean change in satisfaction with care at 2 years from baseline assessed by QLQ-SAT32. Two hundred patients with head and neck cancers were involved in this study (mean age, 58.83 years (range, 36.56–87.89)), of whom 100 were assigned to the intervention arm and 100 to the control arm. Patients in the intervention arm were reported to have a statistically significant increase in EQ VAS at 2 years (p < 0.0001) and exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (mean change at 2 years from baseline = 10.46). In the two arms, mean differences between arms were not statistically significant, but minimal clinically important differences in favor of the intervention arm were found for EQ VAS (mean change difference (MD) = 5.84), satisfaction with care, in particular waiting times (MD = 10.85) and satisfaction with accessibility (MD = 6.52). Routine assessment of HRQoL improves HRQoL and satisfaction with care for patients with HNC treated with radiotherapy.

Dysphagia is common after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC) and can affect health-related quality of life (HRQL). This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the effect of the head-lift exercise (HLE) over 12months in HNC patients with radiation-induced dysphagia. Sixty-one patients with dysphagia were randomized to intervention group (n = 30) and control group (n = 31) at 6-36months after completion of radiotherapy for HNC. Dysphagia-specific HRQL was measured with the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI); general and HNC-specific HRQL was measured with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and QLQ-H&N35. Measurements were made at baseline, and at 8weeks and 12months after start of intervention. Adherence to the intervention was good throughout the year. When comparing change from baseline reports to each follow-up no statistically significant differences between the groups were found in any of the HRQL instruments. There were some statistically significant changes within groups compared to baseline. The intervention group improved self-rated swallowing function on the MDADI at 8weeks (emotional domain, p = 0.03; functional domain, p = 0.007; total score, p = 0.01) and the control at twelve months (emotional domain, p = 0.03; functional domain, p = 0.02; physical domain, p = 0.004; total score, p = 0.002). In this randomized control study, no effect was observed short term or at 12months on HRQL after use of the HLE as rehabilitation for radiation-induced dysphagia.

9077 Background: Cancer survivors typically experience progressive improvements in HRQOL following initial impairments associated with diagnosis and treatments. As previous studies often focused on cancer-free survivors (CFS), little information is available for non-CFS. We report a comparison of HRQOL of HNC survivors either living with cancer or cancer-free 3 years after RT. Methods: We conducted a randomized trial among 540 patients treated with RT for stage I or II HNC to test whether vitamin E supplementation improved outcomes. We assessed prospectively HRQOL with two validated instruments, the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the Head and Neck Radiotherapy Questionnaire (HNRQ), prior treatment and 3 years after RT. Three years after RT, 416 patients provided HRQOL data. Among them, 85 were non-CFS because they had been diagnosed with a relapse or a second primary cancer (SPC). We used t-tests to compare HRQOL dimensions at baseline and at 3 years between non-CFS and CFS. We also compared their HRQOL changes from baseline to 3 years. Results: At baseline, the HRQOL of future non-CFS and CFS was similar except that future non-CFS experienced more HNRQ throat symptoms (p=0.04). At 3 years, the HRQOL of non-CFS and CFS was also similar except that non-CFS had poorer QLQ-C30 global health status than CFS (p=0.01). Most changes from baseline to 3 years after RT were similar for non-CFS and CFS. There were improvements for emotional and social functioning, sleep and financial difficulties of the QLQ-C30, throat symptoms and psychosocial domain of the HNRQ, while both non-CFS and CFS had increased HNRQ oral cavity and skin symptoms. Few HRQOL changes from baseline to 3 years differed significantly between non-CFS and CFS. Non-CFS experienced a worsening in 4 HRQOL dimensions while CFS showed improvements in these 4 dimensions: global health status (p=0.01), pain (p=0.01) and appetite (p=0.02) of the QLQ-C30 and HNRQ energy (p=0.03). Conclusions: Most changes in HRQOL over the 3 years after RT are similar for CFS and non-CFS. However, patients living with cancer after HNC relapse or SPC experienced increased pain and decreased appetite, global health status and energy while CFS showed improvement in these 4 dimensions.

Background: Head and neck cancer (HNC) represents a significant public health issue in West Java, Indonesia. The clinical manifestation of HNC can lead to negative effects on the quality-of-life HNC. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the health-related quality of life of HNC patients at tertiary referral hospital, Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer core questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and EORTC head and neck specific questionnaire (QLQ-H&amp;N35). Methods: This was a prospective cross-sectional study involving 21 patients HNC cancer during July 2025. Data were collected using the EORTC QLQ-C30 to assess general functioning and symptoms, along with the QLQ-H&amp;N35 module to evaluate HNC cancer specific issues. Descriptive analysis was conducted on the scores of major domains. Results: The majority of respondents were male (66.6%) with a mean age of 49.4 years. A total of 52.4% of patients were in stage IV. The highest scores in the QLQ-C30 were financial difficulties (81.16%), pain (73.10%), and emotional disturbances (57.09%). In the QLQ-H&amp;N35, the most prominent complaints were feeling ill (83.9%), eating difficulties (74.7%), and social hindrance (59.6%). Conclusion: HNC patients experience a substantial decline in quality of life, particularly in physical, emotional, social, and financial domains. The use of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&amp;N35 questionnaires effectively provides a comprehensive overview of patient conditions and is recommended for integration into routine clinical practice. Keywords: Head and neck cancer, quality of life, EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-H&amp;N35, Bandung

To assess the added prognostic value for overall survival (OS) of baseline health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and of early changes in HRQOL among patients with localized head and neck cancer (HNC) treated with radiation therapy. All 540 patients with HNC who participated in a randomized trial completed two HRQOL instruments before radiation therapy: the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the Head and Neck Radiotherapy Questionnaire. Six months after the end of radiation therapy, 497 trial participants again completed the two HRQOL instruments. During the follow-up, 179 deaths were observed. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to test whether HRQOL variables, baseline and change, provided additional prognostic value beyond recognized prognostic factors. The baseline EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning (PF) score was an independent predictor of OS. The hazard ratio (HR) associated with a 10-point increment in baseline PF was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.81 to 0.94). In multivariate models, the change in HRQOL was significantly associated with OS for most HRQOL dimensions. Among these, PF change was the strongest predictor. The magnitude of the association between PF change and survival decreased over time. At 1 year, the HR associated with a positive PF change of 10 points was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.68 to 0.83). After PF is taken into account, no other HRQOL variable was associated with survival. Our findings indicate that both baseline PF and PF change provide added prognostic value for OS beyond established predictors in patients with HNC. Assessing HRQOL could help better predict survival of cancer patients.

Background This study aims to investigate the long-term effects of structured trismus intervention in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) and trismus in terms of mouth opening, trismus-related symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQL).Material and methods Fifty patients with HNC to receive radiotherapy ± chemotherapy were included in this prospective study along with a matched control group. The intervention group received a 10-week structured exercise with a jaw mobilizing device (TheraBite® jaw device or Engström device). Patients were assessed before and after trismus exercise intervention and at a two-year follow-up. Primary endpoint was maximum interincisal opening (MIO) and secondary endpoints included trismus-related symptoms and HRQL assessed with patient-reported outcome (PRO)-instruments [Gothenburg Trismus Questionnaire (GTQ), European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the related HNC-specific module the EORTC Head & Neck Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-H&N35)].Results The intervention group had a higher MIO at the two-year follow-up compared to the control group (40.5 mm and 34.3 mm, respectively), which was statistically significant. The intervention group also reported less jaw-related problems according to the GTQ and higher functioning as measured by EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35 compared to the control group.Conclusion A positive persistent effect of exercise intervention for trismus in HNC patients was found with regard to MIO, trismus-related symptoms and HRQL. Exercise intervention is important in long-term treatment of radiation-induced trismus in HNC patients. The trismus-specific questionnaire, GTQ, is a valuable tool for observing and evaluating trismus over time.

Whether patients' health-related quality of life (HRQL) influences the HRQL of their family caregivers remains to be clarified. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the association in HRQL between patients and family caregivers one year after oesophageal cancer surgery. The study was based on a prospective, nationwide, and population-based cohort including patients treated by surgery for oesophageal cancer in Sweden from 2013 to 2021 and their family caregivers. Data were collected one year after surgery, using the summary score of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the RAND-36 questionnaire. Univariate and multivariate linear regression models providing regression coefficients with confidence intervals (CI) were used to estimate the association between the HRQL among patients and family caregivers. The analyses were adjusted for potential covariates. In total, 275 patients and paired family caregivers were included in the study. Patients reported a mean HRQL summary score of 81.4, indicating reductions in functions as well as many burdensome symptoms. Among family caregivers, lowest HRQL scores were reported for pain (69.2±26.0) and energy/fatigue (65.1±20.4). A 10-point change in the patients' summary score corresponded to a 7-point change for family caregivers' emotional role function (β=7.0; 95% CI: 3.6-10.3). For other HRQL dimensions among the family caregivers, no clinically relevant associations with patients HRQL were found. The current study indicates that family caregivers' emotional role function is influenced by patients' overall HRQL one year after surgery. The finding suggests that follow-up interventions should include not only patients but also their family caregivers.

To determine if video-based educational intervention compared to the standard verbal guidelines, provided to caregivers on home-based palliative care could enhance the quality of life (QoL) in advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. The study employed a prospective, two-arm parallel-group, randomized controlled trial design. Investigators prepared a real-world demonstrational video of ten minutes duration regarding home-based care for family caregivers, with voice-over in Odia language (Eastern India). The contents of the video addressed the management of common problems in palliative care among HNC patients. This study included 180 participants, 90 patient & caregiver dyads randomized to interventional (video-based education) or control (verbal instruction) groups. Patients' QoL was measured at baseline and 3weeks follow-up using EORTC QLQ C30. Data were analyzed descriptively, and the Chi-square, Mann-Whitney U, T-test, spearman correlation, and multiple hierarchical regression analyses were employed for statistical analysis, with a significance level of p < 0.05. Seventy participant dyads completed the planned two assessments: baseline and at the end of 3rd week (Intervention = 37; Control = 33). The intervention group showed a significant improvement in the patient's health-related QoL, physical, emotional, and social functioning. Symptom burden reduction was observed for pain, nausea, and fatigue. A significant increase in the change in QoL with the video-based education group (VBE) compared to the verbal instruction (VI) group after adjusting for age, gender, physical functioning, and pain symptomology (adjusted R2 = 0.402) was noted. VBE intervention using smart-phone may offer caregivers a viable means of enhancing self-management while improving patients' QoL within the socio-cultural challenges for home-based palliative care in India. Further research on training caregivers using digital interventions and home-based visits is recommended. CTRI/2021/06/034473 [Registered on: 30/06/2021].

Association between human papillomavirus status and health-related quality of life in oropharyngeal and oral cavity cancer survivors.

BackgroundWith over 500,000 annually reported cases worldwide, head and neck cancer (HNC) is the seventh most common type of cancer worldwide. Treatment of HNC with chemoradiotherapy frequently results in serious impairments in physical and psychosocial functioning. Besides, HNC patients typically start their cancer treatment already with poor physical and psychosocial health. It has been shown that a sufficient level of physical activity (PA) before, during, and after cancer treatment is associated with fewer negative treatment-related side effects and a better quality of life (QOL). In order to prevent worsening of functioning and limit the physical impact of the HNC treatment, a comprehensive supervised exercise program (CSEP) may be beneficial during early cancer treatment. However, up to now, the feasibility and effectiveness of such a program are not yet investigated thoroughly in HNC. Therefore, the primary objective of this study is to examine the effectiveness of a CSEP during HNC treatment, in addition to usual supportive care, compared to usual supportive care alone, on health-related QOL up to 1 year post-diagnosis. Secondary objectives entail gathering information on (1) the effectiveness of a CSEP on secondary outcomes such as physical and mental function, activities of daily life, and participation in society and (2) the feasibility, possible barriers, and facilitators for participation in a CSEP during HNC treatment.MethodsTo investigate the effectiveness of the CSEP, a parallel, open-label randomized controlled trial will be performed. To study the feasibility of the CSEP, a mixed-method study will be performed in a subgroup of participants. HNC patients are eligible if they receive radiotherapy at the Radiation-Oncology department of the University Hospital of Leuven. A 4-size permuted block randomization will be used. The control group receives the current standard of supportive care. The intervention group receives a CSEP, additional to the same usual supportive care. The CSEP consists of a 12-week intensive phase with 3 exercise sessions of 1 h per week, where supervision is gradually reduced after 6 weeks. During the maintenance phase (from week 13), patients exercise at home with monthly tele-consultations with a physiotherapist. The CSEP contains supervised aerobic and resistance training. In both groups, outcomes of interest are evaluated through self-reported questionnaires and clinical assessments, at baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months post-diagnosis. The primary endpoint is health-related QOL, measured with the EORTC QLQ-C30 at 6 months post-diagnosis.DiscussionThe study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. This protocol has been approved by the ethical committee of the University Hospitals Leuven (s65549). Recruitment started in January 2022. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed scientific journals and presentations at congresses.Trial registrationTrial Registration: ClinicalTrials.govIdentifier: NCT05256238Date of registration: February 25, 2022

The effect of age on health-related quality of life for head and neck cancer patients up to 1 year after curative treatment

The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate whether a relationship exists between malnutrition (> or =10% weight loss) and health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients with head and neck cancer and whether weight loss can be predicted with HRQL questionnaires. Weight and HRQL were monitored in 49 patients. HRQL was assessed longitudinally, using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), the EORTC Head and Neck Cancer module (QLQ-H&N35), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). At diagnosis, those patients who had a weight loss greater than 10% (n = 20) after treatment scored significantly worse on 15 of 28 HRQL variables than did patients who lost less (n = 29). The largest difference (Delta > or =20) was found for role functioning, fatigue, loss of appetite, global quality of life, sticky saliva, and swallowing. Differences in HRQL persisted even after 3 years. The fatigue scale was the only significant predictor of weight loss (p = .005) at diagnosis. Patients with head and neck cancer who are at risk of severe weight loss developing during treatment may be detected with the aid of HRQL questionnaires at diagnosis.

BackgroundFew studies have examined health related Quality of Life (HR-QoL) during the treatment of head and neck cancer (HNC) with even fewer focusing on the impact of oral mucositis (OM) on HR-QoL. Studies performed during treatment of HNC makes it possible to follow fluctuations in HR-QoL, OM and other treatment related side effects. The aim was to prospectively analyze HR-QoL, changes in clinical variables and the impact of OM on HR-QoL during HNC treatment.Materials and methodsPatients were recruited before commencing curative cancer treatment and were given professional oral care weekly during oncologic treatment. HR-QoL was reported before, during (week 2, 4 and 6) and three months after treatment using the EORTC Quality of Life questionnaires C30 and H&N35 and the stimulated whole salivary secretion rate was determined at the same time-points. OM (erythema and ulceration) was registered using the Oral Mucositis Assessment Scale (OMAS), at baseline, weekly during treatment and post treatment. Differences in HR-QoL between different timepoints were analyzed. To analyze the impact of OM on HR-QoL the patients were categorized into two groups: no/mild OM (OMAS ulceration score 0–1) or severe OM (OMAS ulceration score ≥ 2) and HR-QoL was compared between the two OM groups at three timepoints during treatment.ResultsFifty-seven patients (43 men, 14 women), with a mean age of 58 years were included. Patients reported progressively impaired HR-QoL, with peak issues noted at weeks 4 and 6, particularly in social eating, senses, appetite loss, sticky saliva, and decreasing salivary secretion rates were determined. Patients with severe OM reported worse HR-QoL compared to those with no/mild OM. Persistent problems 3 months post treatment were appetite loss, dry mouth, senses (smell and taste) and problems with social eating.ConclusionPatients experienced exacerbated symptoms and problems weeks 4 and 6 of oncological treatment, especially among those with severe OM, stressing the importance of clinically monitoring the patients to reduce and alleviate their symptoms. Persistent problems three months post treatment are likely associated with the reduced salivary secretion rate indicating that patients should be monitored also after completed oncological treatment.

Effect of a pre-operative web-based dietary self-management intervention on patient satisfaction, body weight and quality of life of esophageal cancer patients: A prospective, observational study