Palliative Care in Europe: Safeguarding Compassion Amidst Changing End‐of‐Life Policies and Expanding Access to Medically Assisted Dying Position Statement on behalf of the European Academy of Neurology, the European Federation of Neurological Associations and OneNeurology

Palliative care is an interdisciplinary approach to care for terminally ill and dying people that aims at improving their quality of life by treating pain as well as psychological, social, and spiritual needs. Even though palliative care in Europe is often dated back to the so-called modern hospice movement, the medical care for the terminally ill and dying—as opposed to a solely religious care by clergy—has its roots in the early modern age. According to the World Health Organization’s definition, palliative care features a certain set of ideologies: palliative care claims to provide holistic care, exhibits distinct ideals of a good death, and objects to assisted dying. Given that these ideologies allow for religious rationalization, palliative care constitutes a medical field in which medical and religious rationales may co-occur. Anthroposophic palliative care represents an ideal case study to show how religious beliefs enter the medical field, in this case by rationalizing core palliative care ideologies with anthroposophic medical conceptions.

BackgroundFor children with life-limiting conditions home care is a key component of pediatric palliative care. However, poor information is available on service coverage and in particular on country-specific pediatric palliative home care characteristics. The aim of the study was therefore to describe the association between pediatric palliative care coverage and national activities and obtain detailed information on the pediatric palliative home care structure in different European countries.MethodsOnline survey with in-country experts from N = 33 European countries.ResultsPediatric palliative home care (65.6%) represented the most pediatric palliative care units (15.6%) and the least common services. National documents constituted the most widespread national pediatric palliative care activity (59.4%) and were associated with available services. Pediatric palliative home care could be mostly accessed as a service free of charge to families (95.2%) from the time of a child's diagnosis (85.7%). In most countries, oncological and non-oncological patients were cared for in pediatric palliative home care. Only a minority of home care teams covered home-ventilated children. Pediatric palliative home care usually comprised medical care (81.0%), care coordination (71.4%), nursing care (75.0%) and social support (57.1%). Most countries had at least two professional groups working in home care teams (81.0%), mostly physicians and nurses. In many countries, pediatric palliative home care was not available in all regions and did not offer a 24 h-outreach service.ConclusionsPediatric palliative care provision in Europe is heterogeneous. Further work on country-specific structures is needed.

Many studies on spiritual care in palliative care are performed in the US, leaving other continents unexplored. The objective of this systematic review is to map the recent studies on spiritual care in palliative care in Europe. PubMed, CINAHL, ATLA, PsycINFO, ERIC, IBSS, Web of Science, EMBASE, and other databases were searched. Included were European studies published in a peer-reviewed journal in 2015, 2016, or 2017. The characteristics of the included studies were analyzed and a narrative synthesis of the extracted data was performed. 53 articles were included. Spiritual care was seen as attention for spirituality, presence, empowerment, and bringing peace. It implied creative, narrative, and ritual work. Though several studies reported positive effects of spiritual care, like the easing of discomfort, the evidence for spiritual care is low. Requirements for implementation of spiritual care in (palliative) care were: Developing spiritual competency, including self-reflection, and visibility of spirituality and spiritual care, which are required from spiritual counselors that they participated in existing organizational structures. This study has provided insight into spiritual care in palliative care in Europe. Future studies are necessary to develop appropriate patient outcomes and to investigate the effects of spiritual care more fully.

Background: The WHO definition of palliative care includes bereavement support as integral to palliative care, yet a previous survey of bereavement support in palliative care in Europe has shown a range of service responses to loss. A rigorous approach to agreeing and implementing a palliative care bereavement framework was required. Aim: The aim of this study was to develop consensus on best-practice recommendations for bereavement care principles, structures, processes and delivery based on current practice and evidence. Design: In accordance with Guidance on Conducting and Reporting Delphi Studies, a consensus-building five-round Delphi technique was performed. A scoping review of research literature informed drafting of 54 statements by the EAPC Bereavement Task Force. Evaluation of the statements was performed by an expert panel using a 5-point Likert scale. ⩾80% agreement were defined as essential items and 75%–79% agreement were defined as desirable items. Items with a consensus rating <75% were revised during the process. Setting/participants: The Delphi study was carried out by an expert panel among membership organisations of the European Association for Palliative Care. Results: In total, 376 email requests to complete Delphi questionnaire were distributed with a response rate of 23% (n = 87) and a follow-up response-rate of 79% (n = 69). Of the initial 54 statements in six dimensions, 52 statements were endorsed with 26 essential statements and 26 desirable statements. Conclusions: The six dimensions and 52 statements agreed through this Delphi study clarify a coherent direction for development of bereavement services in palliative care in Europe.

Background: Palliative care involves the care for patients with severe and advanced diseases with a focus on quality of life and symptom management. Integration of palliative care with curative and/or chronic care is expected to lead to better results in terms of quality of life and reduced costs. Although initiatives in different countries in Europe choose different structures to integrate care, they face similar challenges when it comes to creating trust and aligning visions, cultures and professional values. This paper sets out to answer the following research question: what roles and attitudes do palliative care professionals need to adopt to further integrate palliative care in Europe?Methods: As part of the European Union (EU)-funded research project InSup-C (Integrated Supportive and Palliative Care). (2012-2016), 19 semi-structured group interviews with 136 (palliative) care professionals in 5 European countries (Germany, the United Kingdom, Belgium, the Netherlands, Hungary) were conducted. A thematic analysis was conducted.Results: Integration of palliative care calls for diplomatic professionals that can bring a cultural shift: to get palliative care, with its particular focus on the four dimensions (physical, psychological, social, spiritual), integrated into historically established medical procedures and guidelines. This requires (a) to find an entrance (for telling a normative story), and (b) to maintain and deepen relationships (in order to build trust). It means using the appropriate words and sending a univocal team message to patients and being grateful, modest, and aiming for a quiet revolution with curation oriented healthcare professionals.Conclusion: Diplomacy appears to be essential to palliative care providers for realizing trust and what can be defined as normative integration between palliative and curative and/or chronic medicine. It requires a practical wisdom about the culture and goals of regular care, as well as keeping a middle road between assimilating with values in regular medicine and standing up for the basic values central to palliative care.

Background: In 2009, the EAPC published recommendations on standards and norms for palliative care in Europe, and a decade later, wished to update them to reflect contemporary practice. Aim: To elicit consensus on standards and norms for palliative care in Europe, taking account of developments since 2009. Design: A Delphi technique used three sequential online survey rounds, and a final expert consultation (EAPC Board). The original 2009 questionnaire with 134 statements was updated with 13 new concepts and practices following a scoping of the literature between 2009 and 2020 (total: 147 statements). Setting/participants: One contact of Boards of 52 national European organisations affiliated to the EAPC were invited to participate, with subsequent rounds sent to respondees. The EAPC Board (n = 13) approved final recommendations. Results: In Round 1: 30 organisations (14 organisations × two people, 16 organisations × one person, total n = 44) in 27 countries responded (response rate 58% organisations, 82% countries), Round 2 (n = 40), Round 3 (n = 38). 119 statements reached consensus in Round 1, 9 in Round 2, 7 in Round 3. In total 135/145 statements in five domains (terminology, philosophy, levels, delivery, services) reached consensus (defined as >75% agreement), (122) were original EAPC recommendations with 13 new recommendations included emerging specialisms: neonatal, geriatric and dementia care, and better care practices. Seven statements failed to reach consensus and four were removed as irrelevant or repetition. Conclusions: Most recommendations on standards and norms for palliative care in Europe remain unchanged since 2009. Evolving concepts in palliative care can be used to support advocacy.

Palliative care in Europe: an emerging approach to comparative analysis

The European Association for Palliative Care Task (EAPC) Force on the Development of Palliative Care in Europe was created in 2003 and the results of its work are now being reported in full, both here and in several other publications. The objective of the Task Force is to assess the degree of palliative care development in the European Region as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO). The Task Force is a collaboration between EAPC, the International Observatory on End of Life Care, Help the Hospices and the International Association for Hospice and Palliative Care. The University of Navarra have collaborated in the dissemination of results and is involved in further developments of this group. Four studies, each with different working methods, made up the study protocol: a literature review, a review of all the existing palliative care directories in Europe, a qualitative `Eurobarometer' survey and a quantitative `Facts Questionnaire' survey. The work of the Task Force covers the entire WHO European Region of 52 countries. In this article we present a comparative study on the development of palliative care in Europe, drawing on all four elements of the study. Different models of service delivery have been developed and implemented throughout the countries of Europe. For example, in addition to the UK, the countries of Germany, Austria, Poland and Italy have a well-developed and extensive network of hospices. The model for mobile teams or hospital support teams has been adopted in a number of countries, most notably in France. Day Centres are a development that is characteristic of the UK with hundreds of these services currently in operation. The number of beds per million inhabitants ranges between 45—75 beds in the most advanced European countries, to only a few beds in others. Estimates on the number of physicians working full time in palliative care are shown. The countries with the highest development of palliative care in their respective subregions as measured in terms of ratio of services per one million inhabitants are: Western Europe — UK (15); Central and Eastern Europe — Poland (9); Commonwealth of Independent States — Armenia (8). This paper also presents indicators on the development of palliative care based on the bibliometric analysis of scientific journals and on the vitality of the palliative care movement in each country. Palliative Medicine 2007; 21: 463—471

Introduction: Integrated palliative care (IPC) should be responsive to patients’ palliative care needs. However, knowledge about the best way to provide IPC is scarce. Evidence is mainly based on perspectives of professionals and carers. Therefore, the InSup-C project conducted a qualitative study on the experiences of patients’ and their carers’ with care provision in several IPC initiatives in five European countries. The aim of this study was to examine how IPC initiatives respond to patients’ problems and needs.Methods: IPC initiatives, i.e. cross-sector collaborations between professionals to provide palliative care, were recruited in five European countries (Belgium, Germany, Hungary, The Netherlands and the UK) between June 2014 and August 2015. From these initiatives patients with cancer, COPD and Chronic Heart failure (CHF) with a prognosis less than 12 months and their carers were recruited. Semi-structured interviews were conducted at baseline and after 3 months using uniform interview protocols. Interview protocols focused on patients’ problems and needs, identification of professionals in patients' care networks, quality of relationships with professionals and inter-professional collaboration. Interviews were transcribed verbatim. Transcriptions were coded using an internationally agreed codebook based on a qualitative thematic approach.Results: Hundred and seventy-five patients and 90 family carers were interviewed. Of 157 patients, 10% were from Belgium, 22% were from Germany, 22% were from the United Kingdom, 27% were from Hungary and 20% were from the Netherlands. Regarding diagnostic group, 62% had cancer, 13% had CHF and 25% had COPD. Mean age was 67 years and 55% were female.Of 90 family caregivers, 17% were from Belgium, 11% were from Germany, 14% were from the United Kingdom, 33% were from Hungary and 24% were from the Netherlands. Mean age was 59 years and 68% were female.The following four themes emerged from the data and related to person-centred care:- Compassionate care: Patients and carers valued professionals who saw the person beyond the illness and who were involved with them. This enabled a personal relationship and care that was being tailored to patient’s holistic problems and needs.- Patient-centred information: Patients and carers found it important that professionals were honest in giving information about prognosis and treatment possibilities and were patient in their explanation. This allowed patients and carers to ask questions and give their opinions. Patient-centred information provided trust and support in times of uncertainty.- Availability of caregivers: Patients and carers appreciated professionals who ‘were there’ for them, that they knew who to contact in case of needs and that professionals responded adequately when it was necessary.- Inter-professional collaboration: Patients and carers found it important that professionals transferred information and consulted each other when necessary. This resulted in professionals who were up-to-date about the patient and prevented them from telling their story over and over again. It also gave them a sense of trust when they experienced that professionals in their network looked after them together.When the four themes were available in care provision patients and carers were satisfied about care received. Many examples of person-centred care were reported, resulting in patients and carers who experienced care provision as a safety net of professionals who feel responsible and work together in order to adequately respond to their palliative care needs. In cases where these components were absent or insufficiently present, it sometimes resulted in unmet needs, uncertainty or dissatisfaction. Indeed, examples of professionals who only focused on the illness instead of seeing patients as a person or who did not collaborate properly were also reported. Frequent complaints were based on a lack information transfer in the professional-patient and/or professional-professional relationship. Although not always desirable, instances of patients or family caregivers who actively transferred information between professionals themselves were reported. In some cases, assertiveness of patients or carers concerning their dissatisfaction lead to improved care experiences. Country specific differences were found regarding availability of medicines, the role of hospices and main professionals.Discussion and conclusion: These results provide valuable insight in the aspects that are deemed important by patients and their carers from five European countries in order to realise person-centred integrated palliative care. These will contribute to the improvement of integrated palliative care in Europe and will therefore be interesting for both clinicians and policy makers who are involved in this field.On behalf of InSup-C: EU FP7 funded project on integrated palliative care in Europe

Communication is a complex issue and one that raises ethical questions within all areas of medicine and in particular palliative care. A group of researchers from England, Italy, the Netherlands and Spain have joined together in a European Commission Biomed 2 project entitled Palliative Care in Europe: Ethics and Communication. The project commenced in August 1998 and aims to address the ethical issues relating to communication within European palliative care services.

BackgroundThere is a wide gap between knowledge about palliative care and its application in everyday clinical practice, affecting many patients in our ageing population. However, changing health care practice is a complex and challenging process. Therefore, the EU funded IMplementation of quality indicators in PAlliative Care sTudy (IMPACT) project aims to develop optimal implementation strategies to improve the organization of palliative care for people with cancer or with dementia in Europe.Methods and designThe organization of palliative care in Europe will be mapped to develop and prepare strategies to improve it, and an overview of barriers and incentives regarding successful organizational changes in palliative care will be undertaken. A pre-test with a set of quality indicators (QIs), developed within the project, will be used to identify aspects of the organization of palliative care requiring change in hospitals, nursing homes, hospices, and primary care in five European countries. Based on the results of the pre-test, each setting will be invited to prioritise and improve aspects of their organization that appeared weak. The improvement objective they choose will be tailored to national and setting-specific barriers. Finally, a post-test with the same QIs will determine the effectiveness of the strategies used. An extensive process analysis will be conducted throughout the entire study.DiscussionIt is expected that the IMPACT project will provide professionals and policy makers useful tools to facilitate effective implementation of high-quality palliative cancer and dementia care in different settings in Europe.

Improving Palliative Care For Patients In The Intensive Care Unit

321 - Palliative care in Europe

Background: The evolution of the provision of palliative care specialised services is important for planning and evaluation. Aim: To examine the development between 2005 and 2012 of three specialised palliative care services across the World Health Organization European Region – home care teams, hospital support teams and inpatient palliative care services. Design and setting: Data were extracted and analysed from two editions of the European Association for Palliative Care Atlas of Palliative Care in Europe. Significant development of each type of services was demonstrated by adjusted residual analysis, ratio of services per population and 2012 coverage (relationship between provision of available services and demand services estimated to meet the palliative care needs of a population). For the measurement of palliative care coverage, we used European Association for Palliative Care White Paper recommendations: one home care team per 100,000 inhabitants, one hospital support team per 200,000 inhabitants and one inpatient palliative care service per 200,000 inhabitants. To estimate evolution at the supranational level, mean comparison between years and European sub-regions is presented. Results: Of 53 countries, 46 (87%) provided data. Europe has developed significant home care team, inpatient palliative care service and hospital support team in 2005–2012. The improvement was statistically significant for Western European countries, but not for Central and Eastern countries. Significant development in at least a type of services was in 21 of 46 (46%) countries. The estimations of 2012 coverage for inpatient palliative care service, home care team and hospital support team are 62%, 52% and 31% for Western European and 20%, 14% and 3% for Central and Eastern, respectively. Conclusion: Although there has been a positive development in overall palliative care coverage in Europe between 2005 and 2012, the services available in most countries are still insufficient to meet the palliative care needs of the population.

BackgroundThe number of people living with advanced cancer and chronic disease has increased worldwide. Many of these patients could benefit from palliative care, focusing on optimising the quality of life of patients and their families facing problems resulting from life-threatening diseases. However, fragmentation and discontinuity of palliative care services often result in suboptimal palliative care. In order to overcome these problems, models using an integrated care approach are increasingly advocated in palliative care services. Although several models and definitions of Integrated Palliative Care (IPC) have been developed, the effects of integrated care are still under-investigated. Knowledge of the key components that constitute successful palliative care integration is still lacking. This mixed methods study will examine the experiences of patients, family caregivers and professional caregivers in order to provide insight into the mechanisms that constitute successful palliative care integration.Methods/DesignProspective multiple embedded case study. Three to five integrated palliative care initiatives will be selected in Belgium, Germany, Hungary, The Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Data collection will involve Social Network Analysis (SNA), a patient diary, semi-structured interviews, and questionnaires: Palliative care Outcome Scale (POS), Canhelp Lite, Caregiver Reaction Assessment (CRA). Patients and family caregivers will be followed in 4 consecutive contact moments over 3 months. The diary will be kept weekly by patients. One focus group per initiative will be conducted with professional caregivers. Interviews and focus groups will be tape recorded, transcribed and qualitatively analysed using NVivo 10. SPSS Statistics 20 will be used for statistical analysis.DiscussionThis study will provide valuable knowledge about barriers, opportunities and good practices in palliative care integration in the selected initiatives across countries. This knowledge can be used in the benchmark of integrated palliative care initiatives across Europe. It will add to the scientific evidence for IPC services internationally and will contribute to improvements in the quality of care and the quality of living and dying of severely ill patients and their relatives in Europe.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1472-684X-13-52) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.