Abstract

Early integration of palliative care for terminally ill cancer and non-cancer patients improves quality of life. However, there are sparse data on results of palliative care consultation services (PCCS) between cancer and non-cancer patients. In this 9-year observational study, data were collected from the Hospice-Palliative Clinical Database (HPCD) of Taichung Veterans General Hospital (TCVGH). Terminally ill cancer and non-cancer patients who received PCCS during 2011 to 2019 were enrolled. Trend analysis was performed to evaluate differences in outcomes of PCCS, including duration of PCCS, the awareness of disease of patients and families before and after PCCS, status of PCCS termination, and DNR declaration before and after PCCS among cancer and non-cancer patients throughout study period. In total, 5223 cancer patients and 536 non-cancer patients received PCCS from 2011 to 2019. The number of people who received PCCS increased stably over the decade, both for cancer and non-cancer patients. The average duration of PCCS for cancer and non-cancer patients was 21.4 days and 18.4 days, respectively. Compared with non-cancer patients, cancer patients had longer duration of PCCS, less DNR declaration (82% vs. 98%, respectively), and more transfers to the palliative care unit (17% vs. 11%, respectively), or for palliative home care (12% vs.8%, respectively). Determinants of late referral to PCCS includes age (OR 0.992, 95% CI 0.987–0.996), DNR declaration after PCCS (OR 1.967, 95% CI 1.574–2.458), patients’ awareness after PCCS (OR 0.754, 95% CI 0.635–0.895), and status of PCCS termination. This 9-year observational study showed that the trend of PCCS among cancer and non-cancer patients had changed over the duration of the study, and early integration of PCCS to all patients is essential for both cancer and non-cancer patients.

Highlights

  • Palliative care, introduced decades ago, is aimed to provide terminally ill patients with better quality of life during their end-of-life periods [1]

  • Data were collected from the Hospice-Palliative Clinical Database (HPCD) of Taichung Veterans General Hospital (TCVGH)

  • The inclusion criteria were every terminally ill cancer and non-cancer patient who was admitted to TCVGH and referred to palliative care consultation services (PCCS) during the period from January 2011 to December 2019

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Palliative care, introduced decades ago, is aimed to provide terminally ill patients with better quality of life during their end-of-life periods [1]. Palliative care can overcome the disease burdens for both cancer and non-cancer patients. PCCS during hospitalization for cancer patients improves awareness of patients and families on the disease diagnosis and prognosis, and increases consent to accept the DNR option [24]. Outcomes of PCCS (for example, the awareness of disease of patients and families, status of PCCS termination, and DNR declaration after PCCS) among cancer and non-cancer patients have been never discussed. PCCS and relocate important resources from economics viewpoint To this end, we here conducted a 9-year-long retrospective observational study in order to compare PCCS outcomes between cancer and non-cancer patients

Materials and Methods
Trend of Cancer and Non-Cancer Patients Receiving PCCS
Determinants of Late Referral to PCCS among Cancer and Non-Cancer Patients
Discussion
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call