P53 Immunohistochemistry staining patterns and prognosis significance in 212 cases of non-endometrioid endometrial cancer

Abstract

ObjectiveTo investigate the immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining pattern and prognostic significance of p53 in non-endometrioid endometrial cancer (non-EEC). MethodsThis study retrospectively included 212 non-EEC patients, with histological types including serous carcinoma (SC), clear cell carcinoma (CCC), mixed carcinoma (MC), undifferentiated carcinoma (UC), and carcinosarcoma (CS). p53 IHC was interpreted as normal/wild-type and abnormal/mutant-type, the latter including overexpression, complete absence, and cytoplasmic staining patterns. Moreover, uncommon p53 subclonal/heterogeneous staining patterns were described. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were employed as endpoints to evaluate the prognostic significance of p53. ResultsIn 212 non-EEC cases, 50 (23.6 %) were p53 wild-type, while 162 (76.4 %) displayed abnormal p53 staining. Overexpression was the predominant abnormal p53 staining pattern (122/162), complete absence followed (33/162). All SCs exhibited the mutant p53 staining pattern. The p53 abnormal expression rates in CCC, MC, UC, and CS were 37.5 %, 78.9 %, 35.7 %, and 75.7 %, respectively. Interestingly, of the 12 MC cases with SC components, barring one with p53 subclonal staining, all showed the mutant-type staining. The concordance rate for p53 expression between epithelial and mesenchymal components of CS was 94.3 % (66/70). Kaplan-Meier curves indicated patients with p53 abnormalities had worse DFS compared to those with wild-type p53 (P=0.025). Multivariate Cox regression confirmed that p53 (HR: 2.270, 95 % CI: 1.124–4.586, P=0.022) independently predicted DFS in non-EEC patients, though not for OS. ConclusionsNon-EEC patients with various histological types exhibit different p53 staining patterns. However, abnormal p53 expression, regardless of histological type, implies a poor DFS in non-EEC patients.