Abstract
Variation in placebo response can ‘confound’ indirect comparisons as it effectively acts as a treatment effect modifier. At the placebo response increases it will tend to “crowd” out the response to active treatments reducing relative treatment effects. The potential confounding arising from heterogeneity in placebo response has been addressed by conducting meta-regression with placebo response as a predictor or by using the risk difference scale. However, meta-regression analyses often lack power, and some degree of confounding remains on the risk difference scale. For binary endpoints, based on an assumption regarding the correlation between treatment and placebo response, an explicit adjustment can made for the contribution of the placebo response to the observed response for active treatments. It is them possible to obtain an estimate of the response to active treatments in the absence of any placebo response. These estimates can be compared to estimate relative treatment effects on the risk difference scale that are not confounded by heterogeneity in treatment response.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.