Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Cervical total disc arthroplasty devices are fundamentally different than interbody devices used in fusion procedures. Unlike an interbody graft were a certain amount of collapse is advantageous and can improve the fusion rate, subsidence of the motion preserving implant will result in loss of motion and recurrence of foraminal stenosis. Implant subsidence may be due to endplate fracture or fatigue failure.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
