Abstract

Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) is considered the gold standard for reporting exercise capacity; however, by definition it requires a maximal effort of subjects. Therefore, the application of VO2max testing is somewhat limited, and is less reliable when applied to the evaluation of several populations including older adults or subjects with various disease states. The Oxygen Uptake Efficiency Slope (OUES) reflects the relationship between oxygen uptake (in ml/min) and the logarithm of total ventilation (in L/min). Recently, Hollenberg & Tager (2000) demonstrated that the OUES is an objective index of VO2max that does not require a maximal exercise effort. PURPOSE To clarify the relative intensity that an incremental sub-maximal exercise test must reach in order to obtain a valid and reliable OUES for the purpose of predicting VO2max. METHODS 15 subjects (10 men and 5 women), healthy, moderately active, mean age 25.3 (range 21 – 37), BMI=23.9±3.2kg/m2 performed an incremental maximal cycle-ergometry (3' of unloaded pedaling followed by increases of 30W × 1'). Breath by breath ventilatory expired gas analysis were performed during the tests and VO2 max measured. The OUES was derived by truncating data at various intensities of VO2max (from 50% to 100%). Results are expressed as mean±SD. RESULTS Mean VO2max was 2903.4 ±944.7 ml/min. The OUES calculated at different intensities of exercise strongly correlated with VO2max (100% r=.983; 50% r=.900). The regression line of the VO2max plotted versus the OUES showed a small progressive percent increase of variations. In particular, the OUES at 65% of VO2max only differed of 6.7% from the OUES at 100% VO2max. CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that the OUES calculated on exercises performed at intensities higher than 65% of VO2max, appears to be a reliable index of cardiovascular function in young healthy subjects. A higher number of subjects will allow us to develop more reliable equations to estimate the VO2max from the OUES. Sponsored in part by the LaBoR Health Excellence Fund and The University of Padova.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.