Abstract

Life-history theory concerns the trade-offs that mold the patterns of investment by animals between reproduction, growth, and survival. It is widely recognized that physiology plays a role in the mediation of life-history trade-offs, but the details remain obscure. As life-history theory concerns aspects of investment in the soma that influence survival, understanding the physiological basis of life histories is related, but not identical, to understanding the process of aging. One idea from the field of aging that has gained considerable traction in the area of life histories is that life-history trade-offs may be mediated by free radical production and oxidative stress. We outline here developments in this field and summarize a number of important unresolved issues that may guide future research efforts. The issues are as follows. First, different tissues and macromolecular targets of oxidative stress respond differently during reproduction. The functional significance of these changes, however, remains uncertain. Consequently there is a need for studies that link oxidative stress measurements to functional outcomes, such as survival. Second, measurements of oxidative stress are often highly invasive or terminal. Terminal studies of oxidative stress in wild animals, where detailed life-history information is available, cannot generally be performed without compromising the aims of the studies that generated the life-history data. There is a need therefore for novel non-invasive measurements of multi-tissue oxidative stress. Third, laboratory studies provide unrivaled opportunities for experimental manipulation but may fail to expose the physiology underpinning life-history effects, because of the benign laboratory environment. Fourth, the idea that oxidative stress might underlie life-history trade-offs does not make specific enough predictions that are amenable to testing. Moreover, there is a paucity of good alternative theoretical models on which contrasting predictions might be based. Fifth, there is an enormous diversity of life-history variation to test the idea that oxidative stress may be a key mediator. So far we have only scratched the surface. Broadening the scope may reveal new strategies linked to the processes of oxidative damage and repair. Finally, understanding the trade-offs in life histories and understanding the process of aging are related but not identical questions. Scientists inhabiting these two spheres of activity seldom collide, yet they have much to learn from each other.

Highlights

  • First formulated in the 1950s (Harman 1956), the free radical damage theory of aging enjoyed a golden period as the predominant mechanistic theory of aging (Beckman and Ames 1998)

  • Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

  • Examples include the impressive body of work by Arlan Richardson and colleagues showing that knocking out or over expressing many of the major protective enzymes against oxidative stress, such as superoxide dismutase, catalase and glutathione peroxidase, leads to the expected changes in oxidative damage, but with no impact on lifespan (Perez et al 2008, 2009c; Jang et al 2009; Zhang et al 2009)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

First formulated in the 1950s (Harman 1956), the free radical damage theory of aging enjoyed a golden period as the predominant mechanistic theory of aging (Beckman and Ames 1998). These are (1) to understand the significance of different responses to reproduction observed in different tissues, (2) to refine the methodology for measuring oxidative stress to allow studies in the field that do not require precious animals in longitudinal studies of life history to be sacrificed, (3) to make laboratory studies more representative of conditions in the wild, (4) to develop good theoretical models enabling refinement of predictions of what we expect experiments to show, and the development of good alternative ideas, (5) to expand the range of species and processes that are studied to gain new perspectives and insights, and (6) to foster greater communication between evolutionary/physiological ecologists and biogerontologists.

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.