Abstract
The liberal conception of ownership of the 19th century is now more remote than ever. This paper discusses the questioning around the current suitability of ownership both for accessing to certain property (housing, to be more specific) and chattels (digital contents, animals and autonomous robots) that have recently flourished, favored by technological advances and the change in the values of the millennials in a context of crisis (since 2007), and see if, at the end of the day, it is adequate or convenient to substitute (e.g. through alternative housing tenures, such as intermediate tenures and collaborative housing, licensing digital contents) or to erode or even eliminate it (e.g. owning animals and robots, tokenization through blockchain).
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
