Overcoming Resistance: How Targeted Approaches Are Changing Management of Advanced EGFR-Mutant Lung Cancer and Paving the Way for Precision Medicine

Central Nervous System Outcomes of Lazertinib Treatment in EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC: Pooled Analysis From LASER201 and LASER301.

Osimertinib, the first approved third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), exhibits notable efficacy in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This is a prospective, multicenter, comprehensive genomic profile signature (GPS) study in paired tissue and plasma samples from 149 patients with advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR exon 19 deletion (Ex19del) or L858R mutation at the first-line treatment failure of osimertinib (NCT05219162). Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was used for comprehensive GPS analysis of paired tissue and plasma samples. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) were used for tissue samples, while droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) and NGS were used for plasma samples to perform a concordance analysis of MET amplification. At the first-line treatment failure of osimertinib (study entry), EGFR alterations in tissue samples included EGFR Ex19del (49.0%, 73/149), EGFR L858R mutation (43.0%, 64/149), EGFR amplification (32.9%, 49/149), EGFR L718Q/V mutation (4.7%, 7/149), and EGFR C797S mutation (3.4%, 5/149); bypass signaling activation and downstream pathway activation alterations included TP53 mutation (69.8%, 104/149) and MET amplification (30.9%, 46/149). Among the 136 patients with EGFR Ex19del/L858R mutation in tissue samples, 72.1% (98/136), 35.3% (48/136), and 32.4% (44/136) had TP53 mutations, EGFR amplification, and MET amplification, respectively. Taking tissue samples as references, the GPS in plasma samples showed high specificity (90.7–100%) for almost all genomic alterations. Compared with FISH (gene copy number [GCN] ≥10), the overall percent agreement of tissue NGS, optimized tissue NGS (GCN ≥ 8.63), plasma NGS, and plasma ddPCR for MET amplification were 75.0% (27/36), 100% (36/36), 88.9% (32/36), and 94.4% (34/36), respectively. This study represents the largest-scale, prospective study with paired tissue and plasma samples to enable comprehensive analysis of GPS, providing a novel perspective into coalterations at the first-line treatment failure of osimertinib. A plasma sample serves as a supplement for identifying GPS when a tissue sample is unavailable. Moreover, the integration of FISH, NGS, and ddPCR provided a comprehensive assessment of MET amplification.

Background: NSCLC accounts for nearly 85% of all lung cancers. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are effective for EGFR mutated NSCLCs, but these drugs often stop working after EGFR acquires additional mutations. Preclinical and clinical data suggest a stronger antitumor effect with dual blockade of the EGFR and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathways in EGFR-mutated NSCLC. RELAY, a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial, demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) with ramucirumab (RAM) + erlotinib compared with placebo + erlotinib in patients with untreated EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. Additionally, RAM was tested in a Phase 1 study with the third-generation irreversible EGFR TKI osimertinib (OSI); AstraZeneca) in NSCLC patients with advanced T790M-positive EGFR mutant tumors after progression on first-line EGFR TKI therapy. OSI can be used with L858R, exon 19 del and T790M EGFR mutant tumors. We investigated the combined use of OSI+RAM in EGFR mutated NSCLC PDX mouse models. Materials and Methods: The antimurine VEGFR2 antibody DC101 (40 mg/kg, BIW) and the EGFR TKI OSI (10 mg/kg, QD) were used in this study. Twenty-seven PDX NSCLC mouse models carrying EGFR activating and/or T790M resistance mutations, commonly detected in patients with advanced NSCLC, were evaluated at 3 independent sites. Mice were divided into 4 treatment arms: vehicle (PBS), DC101, OSI and combination (DC101+OSI). Each study arm included two transplanted mice per model. Sensitivity to DC101 and OSI monotherapies, enhancement of anti-tumor activity with the combination therapy and durability of the response were evaluated. Desirability score, a weighted composite score of six features of tumor growth curves including best median % response, number of days in best response category, time to doubling, re-growth rate (last 5 observations) relative to vehicle growth rate, last observed tumor volume and last observed day, was calculated for each treatment arm. Analysis of variance was used to compare summary scores per animal across treatments. Results: OSI alone and OSI+DC101 combination therapy had stronger antitumor effects than DC101 monotherapy in significantly more models 11 vs 1 and 12 vs 0, respectively. A small but consistent shift in favor of OSI+DC101 vs OSI was observed across most of the models. Paired t-test analyses showed a moderate but significant benefit with combination OSI+DC101 vs OSI. Overall desirability score was statistically improved with OSI+DC101 compared to either single agent. Conclusions: Dual inhibition of EGFR and VEGFR2 with OSI+DC101 had a stronger antitumor effect than those of the respective monotherapies in EGFR mutated NSCLCs in vivo. Future studies will investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying the enhanced antitumor effect of OSI+DC101 combination therapy. Citation Format: Sudhakar Chintharlapalli, Anthony Fischl, Chun Ping Yu, Philip Iversen. Enhanced antitumor effect of dual EGFR and VEGFR2 inhibition in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient-derived tumor xenograft (PDX) models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 1675.

Preventing Symptomatic Central Nervous System Metastasis in EGFR-Mutant Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Comparison of First- and Third-Generation EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

We aimed to verify the efficacy and safety of microwave ablation (MWA) in combination with third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) administration for EGFR-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Individuals with advanced NSCLC and EGFR mutations who underwent third-generation EGFR-TKI treatment and MWA (EGFR-TKI treatment followed by MWA [Group E + M] and MWA followed by EGFR-TKI treatment [Group M + E]) were retrospectively enrolled. The primary endpoint was duration of response (DoR). There were 12 patients in Group E + M and 16 in Group M + E. The overall median DoR was 21.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.3-26.4). The median DoR was 25.7 months (95% CI: 20.6-30.9) and 20.5 months (95% CI: 5.9-35.1) in Group E + M and Group M + E ( P = 0.996), respectively. When EGFR-TKIs were used as a first-line treatment, the median DoR overall and that of patients in Groups E + M and M + E were 29.3 months (95% CI: 19.2-39.4), 29.3 months (95% CI: 21.0-37.5), and not reached ( P = 0.252), respectively. Major complications related to pneumothorax were observed in five patients, with no difference observed between the groups. Patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC who underwent third-generation EGFR-TKI treatment plus MWA had a superior DoR and experienced minimal complications.

Osimertinib, a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is the only Food and Drug Administration-approved third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)TKI. Osimertinib is a cancer medicine that interferes with the growth and spread of cancer cells in the body. Osimertinib is used to treat a certain type of non-small cell lung cancer. We review some of the main challenges in targeting EGFR, including lack of central nervous system penetration with most tyrosine kinase inhibitors, activity of osimertinib penetrating blood-brain barrier and the efficacy of osimertinib. Guided by the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement, we conducted a systematic literature search in the databases PubMed, EMBASE, ISI Web of Science database on January 30, 2020, searching for studies investigating the osimertinib efficacy on patients with CNS metastases in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). And Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the certainty in the evidence. The pooled results showed that the overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 70% and 92%, respectively, in patients with T790M mutations. The efficacy of osimertinib was confirmed by the median progression free survival (PFS). In untreated advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC with CNS metastases patients, the pooled ORR and DCR of osimertinib were 71% and 93%, respectively. And the combined median PFS, achieved by osimertinib, was 12.21 months. Above data proved that osimertinib has well activity in disease control, especially in first line. This meta-analysis confirmed that in treatment-naive advanced NSCLC CNS metastases harboring EGFR-TKI-sensitizing mutations, Osimertinib showed impressive antitumor activity.

Furmonertinib is a novel third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). A phase Ib study (FAVOUR, NCT04858958) initially demonstrated the efficacy of furmonertinib in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR exon 20 insertion (ex20ins). This study aimed to investigate the real-world efficacy and safety of furmonertinib in patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins. We retrospectively examined patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins having complete follow-up data, who were treated with furmonertinib from April 14, 2021, to March 15, 2022, at our institution and multiple hospitals in China. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rates and treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) were assessed. This study included 53 patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins. A767_V769dup (28.3%) and S768_D770dup (11.3%) are the major variants. The ORR and DCR were 37.7% (20/53) and 92.5% (49/53), respectively. The 6-month PFS rate was 69.4% (95% CI 53.7-85.1%). The ORR of patients in the 240mg once-daily dosage group was higher (42.9%) than that of patients in the 80mg once-daily (25.0%) and 160mg once-daily (39.5%) groups, but with no statistically significant difference (P = 0.816). The ORR of furmonertinib is not dependent on insertion location (P = 0.893). Patients with central nervous system (CNS) metastases at baseline responded similarly to those without CNS metastases (ORR: 33.3% vs. 40.6%, P = 0.773). The most common AEs were diarrhea (26.4%) and rash (26.4%). No grade ≥ 3 TRAEs were observed. No statistically significant difference was observed in the incidence of TRAEs between dosage groups (P = 0.271). Furmonertinib has shown encouraging antitumor activity and CNS activity in patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins. Moreover, furmonertinib had a good safety profile and no dose-dependent toxicity.

BackgroundOsimertinib shows higher effectiveness than first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in the initial treatment of EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer. However, its superiority in terms of overall survival in the Asian population, especially Japanese patients, remains uncertain.ObjectiveTo evaluate the survival benefit of osimertinib over other EGFR-TKIs in Japanese patients, using real-world data.Methods As part of the Tokushukai REAl-world Data project, a retrospective multi-institutional study across 46 hospitals in Japan was conducted to evaluate the overall survival of patients with advanced EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer using propensity score matching. The study involved patients receiving osimertinib as the first-line treatment (1L-Osi), those initially treated with other EGFR-TKIs (1L-non-Osi), and those receiving osimertinib after initial EGFR-TKI treatment (2L/later-Osi) between April 2010 and December 2022 and followed up until April 2023.ResultsAmong 1062 Japanese patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer, 416 (39.2%) received 1L-Osi, while 646 (60.8%) received 1L-non-Osi, including 139 (13.1%) who received 2L/later-Osi. Within these groups, 416 (39.2%), 293 (27.6%), and 75 (7.1%) patients received first-line EGFR-TKI treatment post-osimertinib approval as a later-line treatment in Japan (March 2016). After propensity score matching, the overall survival of the 1L-Osi group was comparable to that of the 1L-non-Osi group in the post-March 2016 subset (n = 283, 42.0 vs 42.4 months). Similar trends were observed in the Del19 and L858R subgroups. The median overall survival of the 2L/later-Osi group was notably long: 60.2 months post-March 2016 (n = 75). A subgroup analysis based on initial EGFR-TKI treatment in the 1L-non-Osi and 2L/later-Osi groups revealed no significant differences among the gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib groups.ConclusionsBased on real-world data, osimertinib did not show a significant improvement in overall survival compared to other EGFR-TKIs as a first-line treatment for EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the Japanese (Asian) population.Clinical Trial RegistrationThis study was registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry on 9 March, 2023 (identification UMIN000050552).

The non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts approximately 85% of lung cancers and includes predominantly adenocarcinomas, which is the most common type and squamous cell carcinomas. The treatment options include surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy and the decision depends on the patient’s medical status and stage of disease. From 1970 the standard first line treatment for most patients with unresectable NSCLC and good performance status was the use of a combination of chemotherapy regimens and usually cisplatin-based. The most common combination regimens in use at present are platinum based regimens with gemcitabine, with paclitaxel or docetaxel and with vinorelbine combinations. The addition of the recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody bevacizumab that binds to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) to carboplatin and paclitaxel for the treatment of non-squamous advanced NSCLC has demonstrated to increase response rate (RR), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) when compared to chemotherapy alone. Despite recent advances with approval of more active chemotherapeutic and anti-angiogenesis agents for stage IV NSCLC, standard therapy can provide only modest clinical benefits with significant toxicities when used in unselected patients. In 2004, the identification of somatic mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene provided the first glimpse of a possible target for a treatment which could maximize clinical outcome in those patients who could benefit from a personalized therapy. Identifying mutations in oncogenes associated with non-squamous NSCLC can help determine which patients are more likely to benefit from a targeted therapy. Such oncogenes include EGFR, KRAS, and ALK. The presence of an EGFR mutation confers a more favorable prognosis and strongly predicts for sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as erlotinib, gefitinib, and afatinib. The use of EGFR TKIs is based upon the detection of these mutations. The incidence of EGFR mutations in tumors with non-small-cell histology ranges from ~15% in Caucasians to ~50% in East Asians; 95% of such mutations have been found in adenocarcinomas. Patients bearing EGFR mutations have shown favorable clinical outcomes even with conventional chemotherapy suggesting that EGFR may be a predictive and a prognostic factor. Activation of the EGFR protein stimulates protein tyrosine kinase, which leads to activation of signaling pathways associated with cell growth and survival. Both EGFR overexpression and activating mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain of the EGFR gene lead to tumor growth and progression. Erlotinib, gefitinib and afatinib are examples of EGFR TKIs that can prevent activation of the signaling pathways and improve RRs in selected NSCLC patients. These mutations which are associated with increased sensitivity to EGFR TKIs, predominate in never-smokers, females, and tumors with adenocarcinoma histology. The most common mutations associated with sensitivity to EGFR TKIs include exon 19 deletions and the L858R point mutation and they are associated with RRs of >70%. Other EGFR mutations like T790M and exon 20 insertion, have been associated with much lower response or acquired resistance to TKI’s. The predictive value of EGFR mutations for use of gefitinib has been strengthened by the results of three randomized phase III trials that specifically compared TKIs used as first-line therapy with traditional platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. In 2009 the results of IRESSA Pan-Asia Study were presented. This trial included a big number of Asian ethnicity patients (1,217) who were never smokers or former light smokers with histologic diagnosis of adenocarcinoma. The trial demonstrated an improvement in PFS and RR, with no statistical difference in OS, with the use of gefitinib in EGFR-mutated tumors and better RR and PFS with standard chemotherapy in patients without mutations. The first phase III trial of gefitinib versus chemotherapy as initial treatment of recurrent or advanced NSCLC, based on selection of patients with known activating EGFR mutations was the WJTOG3405 trial, reported in 2010. This trial documented important achievements in RR and PFS with the use of TKIs. Almost the same results were confirmed by another similar Japanese phase III trial, NEJ002, with RR and PFS definitely favoring the use of gefitinib in the first-line setting of metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Based on the results of the IPASS study, gefitinib was approved for use in Europe for the initial treatment of patients with NSCLC exhibiting EGFR mutations. The positive results of the EURTAC trial, NCT00446225, which was a randomized phase III trial of erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy, suggested that responsiveness in mutation-positive patients was not a function of ethnicity. Afatinib is approved as monotherapy for the treatment of EGFR TKI—naïve adults with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with activating EGFR mutations in the EU, and for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic NSCLC whose tumors have EGFR exon 19 deletions or exon 21 (L858R) substitution mutations as detected by a US FDA-approved test in the US. In two randomized, open-label, multinational phase III trials, progression-free survival was significantly prolonged with afatinib compared with pemetrexed plus cisplatin (LUX-Lung 3) or gemcitabine plus cisplatin (LUX-Lung 6) in treatment-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC with activating EGFR mutations. EGFR-TKIs as a class are generally well tolerated. The two most common toxicities include dermatologic and GI effects, which are mild to moderate, easily managed and reversible. In order to determine whether an EGFR TKI or chemotherapy is the appropriate first-line therapy, the latest guidelines recommend mutation testing for all patients with advanced NSCLC tumor. The aim of this prospective study is to compare the efficacy of gefitinib, erlotinib and afatinib in patients with advanced NSCLC harboring activating EGFR mutations in first line of treatment. These agents are recommended as first line treatments for NSCLCs with such mutations. The primary endpoint will be the PFS and the secondaries will be the OS and the record of the toxicities. In each of the 3 arms will be participate 20 patients with EGFR mutated tumors. The technique for screening NSCLC patients for driver mutations that it will be used is next-generation sequencing, which overcomes many of the shortcomings of direct sequencing. This massively parallel approach, relying heavily on automation, data storage, and computational processing, allows quantitative analysis of infrequent alleles and simultaneous evaluation of multiple genes or even whole genomes, but is not yet used routinely in clinical practice. In addition, KRAS mutation analysis will be performed in patients with known smoking history in order to determine the correlation of type and mutation frequency with smoking.

BackgroundOsimertinib is an irreversible third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). It is the preferred first-line treatment for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared to first-generation EGFR-TKIs. However, limited research has compared its clinical effectiveness with second-generation (2nd G) EGFR-TKIs.Materials and methodsThis study recruited patients diagnosed with stage IIIb-IV EGFR-mutated NSCLC who received first-line treatment with either 2nd G EGFR-TKIs (afatinib and dacomitinib) or osimertinib between April 2020 and April 2023.ResultsThe final analysis included 168 patients, of whom 113 received 2nd G EGFR-TKIs (afatinib or dacomitinib) and 55 received osimertinib. The median progression-free survival (PFS) did not differ significantly between 2nd G EGFR-TKIs and osimertinib (del 19: 17.6 months; L858R: 20.0 months vs. 28.3 months, p = 0.081). In patients with the EGFR exon 19 deletion, osimertinib conferred a longer median PFS (28.3 vs. 17.6 months, p = 0.118) and time to treatment failure (30.2 vs. 22.7 months, p = 0.722) than 2nd G EGFR-TKIs. However, the differences were not statistically significant. In patients with with the EGFR exon 19 deletion and central nervous system metastasis, the median PFS did not differ significantly between those treated with osimertinib (14.3 months) and those treated with 2nd G EGFR-TKIs (17.6 months; p = 0.881). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that the NSCLC stage was the only independent negative predictor of PFS. The treatment patterns in the second line also differed significantly between groups (p = 0.008).ConclusionsThis study found comparable effectiveness between osimertinib and 2nd G EGFR-TKIs as first-line treatment for advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC, with only the NSCLC stage identified as a negative predictor of PFS. However, whether the different second-line treatments affect overall survival should be examined.

1O Furmonertinib versus gefitinib in treatment-naïve EGFR mutated non-small cell lung cancer: A randomized, double-blind, multi-center, phase III study (FURLONG)

Osimertinib is an irreversible, third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is highly selective for EGFR-activating mutations as well as the EGFR T790M mutation in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR oncogene addiction. Despite the documented efficacy of osimertinib in first- and second-line settings, patients inevitably develop resistance, with no further clear-cut therapeutic options to date other than chemotherapy and locally ablative therapy for selected individuals. On account of the high degree of tumour heterogeneity and adaptive cellular signalling pathways in NSCLC, the acquired osimertinib resistance is highly heterogeneous, encompassing EGFR-dependent as well as EGFR-independent mechanisms. Furthermore, data from repeat plasma genotyping analyses have highlighted differences in the frequency and preponderance of resistance mechanisms when osimertinib is administered in a front-line versus second-line setting, underlying the discrepancies in selection pressure and clonal evolution. This review summarises the molecular mechanisms of resistance to osimertinib in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC, including MET/HER2 amplification, activation of the RAS–mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) or RAS–phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathways, novel fusion events and histological/phenotypic transformation, as well as discussing the current evidence regarding potential new approaches to counteract osimertinib resistance.

9106 Background: ASK120067 (Limertinib) is a newly developed third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeting both sensitizing EGFR and EGFR T790M mutations. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ASK120067 in patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFR T790M mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: This study was a single-arm, open-label, phase 2b study conducted at 62 hospitals across China. Patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with centrally confirmed EGFR T790M mutations in tumor tissue or blood plasma who progressed after first or second generation EGFR TKIs or with primary EGFR T790M mutations were enrolled. Patients received ASK120067 160mg orally twice daily, until disease progression, or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC) per RECIST1.1. Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), overall survival (OS), and safety. Safety was assessed according to CTCAE 4.03. Results: Between June 24th, 2019 and Feb 25th, 2021 301 patients were enrolled and received ASK120067 treatment. All patients entered the full analysis set (FAS) and safety set (SS). A total of 99 (32.9%) patients had central nervous system (CNS) metastases at baseline. By the data cutoff date on Sep 9th, 2021, 76 (25.2%) remained on treatment. The median follow-up time was10.4 (range 0.3-26.3) months. Based on FAS, the IRC-assessed ORR was 68.8% (95%CI 63.2%-74.0%) and DCR was 92.4% (95%CI 88.8%-95.1%). The median PFS was 11.0 (95%CI 9.7-12.4) months, median DOR was 11.1 (95%CI 9.6-13.8) months, and median OS was not reached (NR) (95%CI 19.7 months-NR). Objective responses were achieved across all pre-specified subgroups. For 99 patients with CNS metastases, the ORR was 64.6% (95%CI 54.4%-74.0%), median PFS was 9.7 (95%CI 5.9-11.6) months, and median DOR was 9.6 (95%CI 8.1-15.2) months. For 41 patients who had evaluable CNS lesion, the confirmed CNS-ORR was 56.1% (95%CI, 39.7%-71.5%) and median CNS-PFS was 10.6 (95%CI 5.6-NE) months. In SS, 289 (96.0%) patients experienced at least one adverse drug reaction (ADR), with the most common being diarrhea (81.7%), anemia (32.6%), rash (29.9%) and appetite decrease (28.2%). Grade ≥3 ADRs occurred in 104 (34.6%) patients, and the most common included diarrhea (13.0%), hypokalemia (4.3%), anemia (4.0%) and rash (3.3%). ADRs leading to dose interruption and dose discontinuation occurred 24.6% and 2% of patients, respectively. No ADR leading to death occurred. Conclusions: ASK120067 demonstrated promising efficacy and an acceptable safety profile for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFR T790M mutated NSCLC. Clinical trial information: NCT03502850.

Central nervous system (CNS) metastasis is a poor prognostic factor in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation EGFR-mutant NSCLC and is associated with a deteriorated quality of life (QOL). Some clinical studies have suggested a possible difference in the incidence of CNS metastasis between EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients treated with gefitinib and erlotinib, both of which are classified as first-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, the difference in the incidence of CNS metastasis between patients receiving these two drugs has not yet been sufficiently well investigated. We analyzed the frequency of occurrence/progression of CNS metastasis in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients treated with erlotinib and gefitinib as the first-line treatment. We analyzed the incidence of CNS metastasis, frequency of progression of CNS metastasis and the treatment outcomes in EGFR-mutant patients who received gefitinib or erlotinib as the first-line EGFR-TKI treatment. CNS progressive disease (PD) was defined as progression of CNS metastasis during EGFR-TKI treatment. We also evaluated the progression-free survival (PFS), CNS-PFS, and overall survival (OS) of the patients who received each of the two drugs. A total of 170 patients were enrolled in the study, of which 144 had received gefitinib, and 26 had received erlotinib. The frequency of CNS PD in the erlotinib group tended to be lower than that in the gefitinib group (11.5% vs. 29.9%, P=0.06). In patients with no existing CNS metastasis at the start of the EGFR-TKI treatments, the incidence of CNS PD was significantly lower in the erlotinib group than that in the gefitinib group (4.8% vs. 24.5%, P=0.04). A re-biopsy after failure of EGFR-TKI treatment was performed in 48 patients. The incidence of EGFR T790M tended to be higher among patients with CNS PD than in those without CNS PD, although the difference was not statistically significant (66.7% vs. 40.4%; P=0.23). The incidence of progression of CNS metastasis during erlotinib treatment was lower than that during gefitinib treatment. In addition, the difference in the incidence in patients without existing CNS metastasis at the time of start of EGFR-TKI treatment was significantly lower in the patients treated with erlotinib than in those treated with gefitinib.

Acquired resistance is unavoidable with the approval of third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for first-line therapy of advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Some studies have found that combining antiangiogenesis medicines with EGFR-TKI may benefit clinical outcomes in EGFR-mutant NSCLC. However, it is unclear whether EGFR-TKI paired with antiangiogenesis therapy could further improve survival for patients with gradual progression. Thus, we comprised the clinical effectiveness and safety of continuous EGFR-TKI in combination with anlotinib and EGFR-TKI alone in patients who had gradual progression on third-generation EGFR-TKI treatment. The comparison of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival(OS) between two groups used the Kaplan-Meier method. Our study comprised 121 eligible patients in total. The objective response rates were 25.0% and 0%, and the disease response rate was 91.7% and 86.9% in the combination group and EGFR-TKIs monotherapy group. The median PFS of combined anlotinib and EGFR-TKI treatment was 6.7 months and the median PFS was 3.6 months in the EGFR-TKI monotherapy group ( P < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups in OS. The common adverse reactions were diarrhea (21.7%), hypertension (21.6%) and proteinuria (20.0%) in the combination group. Seven patients experienced a grade 3 or higher adverse event, no patients discounted the treatment or died due to the toxicity. Our study indicated that, when combined with anlotinib following gradual progression on EGFR-TKIs, it was more efficacious for EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients than EGFR-TKI monotherapy. And the toxicity was clinically manageable.