Outcomes of Gastrostomy Tubes in Newborns With Congenital Heart Disease and Comparison of Techniques

Abstract

IntroductionGastrostomy tube (GT) placement for enteral access is one of the most common procedures for infants with numerous conditions such as congenital heart disease (CHD). Discrepancies in the literature exist regarding outcomes of newborns with CHD undergoing GT placement. This study sought to characterize postoperative outcomes and readmission complications in this patient population. MethodsThe Nationwide Readmission Database was queried from 2010 to 2014 for all newborns who underwent GT placement during their index hospitalization. Newborns with or without CHD other than an isolated atrial or ventricular septal defect were compared using standard statistical tests. A propensity score–matched analysis was performed among newborns with or without CHD using > 100 covariates. ResultsSeven thousand seven hundred thirty six patients underwent GT placement. Newborns with CHD (27%) more frequently underwent open GT (59% versus 55%) and less frequently underwent laparoscopic (17% versus 19%) or percutaneous (24% versus 26%) GT placement compared to those without CHD, P = 0.043. GT-related complications on index admission were similar between groups (7% versus 7%, P = 0.770). Newborns with CHD had higher overall readmission rates (39% versus 31%), more GT-related readmission complications (7% versus 3%), and higher readmission costs ($35,787 versus $20,073) compared to newborns without CHD, all P < 0.001. Laparoscopic GT was associated with the lowest rate of GT-related complications (0%) and overall readmission rates (27%) compared to open or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (all P < 0.001). ConclusionsCompared to newborns without CHD, newborns with CHD had higher rates of overall readmissions, readmission costs, and GT-related complications on readmission. The laparoscopic GT approach was underused despite fewer complications and readmissions.