Outcomes of Anterior Mesh Rectopexy with Sacrocolpopexy for Multi-compartment Prolapse

Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy: The “6-Points” Technique

Anterior mesh rectopexy is a novel surgical technique for the treatment of complete rectal prolapse, a common disorder in female elderly patients. Aim of the study was to evaluate functional outcomes after ventral mesh rectopexy and conventional suture rectopexy. Forty patients have been enrolled in this prospective study. Patients were divided into two groups: 20 patients (group A) had a conventional suture rectopexy with a standard technique and 20 patients (group B) underwent an anterior mesh rectopexy. Each patient had a clinic and defecographic diagnosis of full-thickness rectal prolapse, which was further investigated with manometry and clinical questionnaires (Wexner Constipation and Incontinence Score, Rome III criteria). Postoperative outcomes were evaluated through clinical questionnaires, a rigid rectosigmoidoscopy and a defecography, 1year after surgery. Preoperative Wexner constipation score was greater than 15 in all the patients (21 in group A and 22 in group B); median postoperative score was 15 in group A and 11 in group B, and the difference was significant. Median preoperative incontinence score was 11 in group A and 12 in group B; median postoperative score was 9 in group A and 6 in group B. Three patients experienced recurrence in group A and only 1 patient in group B. Ventral mesh rectopexy is feasible, safe and effective for the treatment of full-thickness rectal prolapse in a well-fit geriatric population. Better functional results have been achieved compared with conventional suture technique with a trend toward a lower recurrence rate.

Multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse, including concurrent rectal and vaginal prolapse, is increasingly recognized in aging populations. This review summarizes recent advances in diagnostic imaging, multidisciplinary evaluation, and surgical techniques for combined repair. Multicompartment prolapse is increasingly prevalent and often underrecognized without coordinated evaluation. Dynamic defecography, particularly upright or MRI-based, improves detection of multicompartment descent. Minimally invasive combined sacrocolpopexy (SCP) and ventral mesh rectopexy (VMR) is increasingly used with favorable outcomes. Surgical series report low complication rates and suggest a potential reduction in prolapse recurrence with combined repair. Robotic platforms, including newer systems, enhance precision, and visualization. Emerging techniques include laparoscopic resection rectopexy with SCP and selective use of biologic mesh. Multidisciplinary care improves coordination and recurrence prevention. Contemporary management of multicompartment prolapse requires a collaborative, patient-centered approach. Advances in imaging and minimally invasive surgery, particularly robotic SCP and VMR, have improved outcomes. Future research should focus on standardizing techniques, optimizing mesh configurations, and long-term functional results.

7553 Laparoscopic Management of Rectal Prolapse

Pelvic floor disorders are a major public health issue. For female genital prolapse, sacrocolpopexy is the gold standard. Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy is a relatively new and promising technique correcting rectal prolapse. There is no literature combining the 2 robotically assisted techniques. This study was designed to evaluate the safety, quality of life, and functional and sexual outcomes of robot-assisted sacrocolporectopexy for multicompartment prolapse of the pelvic floor. This was a prospective, observational cohort study. The study was conducted in a tertiary care setting. All sexually active patients undergoing robot-assisted sacrocolporectopexy at our institution between 2012 and 2014 were included. Robot-assisted sacrocolporectopexy was the study intervention. Preoperative and postoperative (12 months) questionnaires using the Urinary Distress Inventory, Pescatori Incontinence Scale, Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire were completed. In addition Wexner and Vaizey incontinence scores and the Wexner constipation score were recorded postoperatively. Fifty-one patients underwent robot-assisted sacrocolporectopexy (median follow-up, 12.5 months). The simplified Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification improved significantly (p < 0.0005) for all 4 of the anatomic landmarks. Both median fecal (preoperative and postoperative Pescatori 4 vs 3, p = 0.002) and urinary incontinence scores (Urinary Distress Inventory, 27.8 vs 22.2; p < 0.0005) improved significantly at 12 months. Postoperatively median Wexner (3) and Vaizey incontinence (6) and Wexner Constipation (7) scores were noted. A positive effect on sexual function (Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire score 31.8 vs 35.9; p = 0.002) and quality of life for each compartment (p < 0.0005) was observed. One patient (2%) developed mesh erosion. No multicompartment recurrences were detected. This was a observational study with a limited follow-up, no control group, and no preoperatively validated constipation score. Robot-assisted sacrocolporectopexy is a safe and effective technique for multicompartment prolapse in terms of functional outcome, quality of life, and sexual function.

This case report presents the management of a patient with multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse through laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy and lateral suspension in a single transabdominal approach.The surgical technique was described in the video.The patient was discharged on postoperative day 3. Obstructed defecation had completely regressed.There were no complaints after 2 years.Prolapse involving more than one compartment can occur concurrently and requires multidisciplinary management.

Defaecating proctogram (DP) studies have become an integral part of the evaluation of patients with pelvic floor disorders. However, their impact on treatment decision-making remains unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the concordance of decision-making by colorectal surgeons and the role of the DP in this process. Four colorectal surgeons were presented with online surveys containing the complete history, examination and investigations of 106 de-identified pelvic floor patients who had received one of three treatment options: physiotherapy only, anterior Delorme's procedure or anterior mesh rectopexy. The survey assessed the management decisions made by each of the surgeons for the three treatments both before and after the addition of the DP to the diagnostic work-up. After the addition of the DP results; treatment choice changed in 219 (52%) of 424 surgical decisions and interrater agreement improved significantly from κ = 0.26 to κ = 0.39. Three of the four surgeons reported a significant increase in confidence. Agreement with the actual treatments patients received increased from κ = 0.21 to κ = 0.28. Intra-anal rectal prolapse on DP was a significant predictor of a decision to perform anterior mesh rectopexy. The DP improves interclinician agreement in the management of pelvic floor disorders and enhances the confidence in treatment decisions. Intra-anal rectal prolapse was the most influential DP parameter in treatment decision-making.

Objective Multicompartmental pelvic floor descensus typically affects women after menopause, leading to a combination of faecal and urinary incontinence, dyspareunia, and evacuation disorders. The aim of this study was to access postoperative quality of life and complications as well as outcome after one-year follow-up after operation of multicompartmental pelvic floor prolapse (POP). Methods All Patients undergoing ventral mesh rectopexy by surgical department and anterior mesh sacrocolpopexy by gynecologists at the same time between 2015 and 2020 were enrolled. The study is a retrospective cohort study approved by the local Ethics committee. Follow-up was scheduled at 6 weeks, 6, and 12 months and consisted of clinical examination and questionnaires. Perioperative and long-time morbidity was assessed according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Quality of life and patients’ satisfaction were evaluated at each consultation. Results Twenty-seven patients were included. All patients were seen at one-year follow-up. Demographic and clinical features are reported in Table 1. Preoperatively, 22 patients (81.5%) were diagnosed with stage II-III (POP-Q) prolapse and severe multicompartment descensus detected on Magnetic Resonance (MR). Laparoscopic surgery was performed in 92.5% of cases and intraoperative conversion was necessary in 2 cases. In 15 cases (55%) a Dynamesh® Visible, in 11 cases (41%) a Gynamesh®, and in one (4%) case a Surgipro™ Mesh was used. No severe complications (Clavien-Dindo &amp;gt;=3) occurred postoperatively. 90-day mortality was 0%. Intraoperatively, a total of 1 vaginal, and 2 bladder lesions were corrected and healed without consequences. At 1 year, patients reported a high level of satisfaction and massive improvement of QoL (8.5 Pt. VAS Scale). During follow-up, one patient had to be reoperated because of incisional hernia and one to cover vaginal mesh exposure. A tension free vaginal tape (TVT) had to be inserted in 4 patients (15%) due to new onset of urinary incontinence. Symptomatic recurrence of prolapse did not occur. Conclusion Interdisciplinary combined sacrocolporectopexy is an effective therapy of multicompartmental pelvic floor descensus. It is a safe procedure with low perioperative morbidity and high patients’ satisfaction. Therefore, it might be the procedure of choice to correct multicompartmental POP.

We present a modified laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy procedure using biological mesh and bilateral anterior mesh fixation. The rectopexy is anterior with a minimal posterior mobilization. The rectum is symmetrically suspended to the sacral promontory through a mesorectal window.