Abstract

Previous retrospective studies showed high periprocedure mortality rate and poor outcome after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) among renal dialysis patients. The purpose of this study was to compare mortality and clinical event rates in renal dialysis patients after PTCA or CABG. We identified 252 patients from the Emory Cardiovascular Database who were on dialysis and who received PTCA (122 patients) or CABG (130 patients) at Emory University Hospital and Crawford W. Long Hospital between March 1987 and December 1997. Baseline and angiographic characteristics, in-hospital, and 1-year outcome were compared between the 2 groups. Left main disease and 3-vessel coronary artery disease were significantly more common in the CABG group. There was a higher periprocedure and in-hospital mortality in the CABG group (6.9% vs 1.6%, p = 0.04). Patients in the PTCA group underwent repeat revascularization 11 times more frequently within 1 year (22% vs 2%). At 1 year, mortality was 23% in the PTCA group and 27% in the CABG group, with no statistical difference between the 2 groups. This nonrandomized comparison reveals that PTCA and CABG can be performed in selected renal dialysis patients with an acceptable in-hospital major complication rate; however, 1-year mortality remains high in dialysis patients after coronary revascularization. Therefore, attempts at improving outcome in dialysis patients should focus on the prevention and treatment of coronary artery disease before they require coronary revascularization.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.