Abstract

SummaryAim: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 177Lu-octreotate is an effective treatment option for metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP NET) and allows intratherapeutic imaging through a 177Lu-octreotate scan (LuS). The diagnostic value of this treatment scan is not yet established. This study aims to compare the sensitivity of LuS and bone scintigraphy (BS) regarding bone metastases and investigate potential implications of functional imaging results. Patients, methods: We retrospectively analyzed 29 consecutive GEP NET patients with bone metastases and baseline BS treated with 177Lu-octreotate. A semi-quantitative scoring system was used for the comparative evaluation. Treatment outcome (time-to-progression of bone metastases) was correlated with the intra-individual imaging discrepancy (Kaplan- Meyer curves, log-rank test, p < 0.05). Results: In 19 of 29 patients (65.5%) LuS was superior (LuS > BS), whereas in 10 patients (34.5%) both modalities were comparable. BS showed no additional (LuS-negative) metastatic bone lesions in our cohort. None of the investigated baseline characteristics was associated with Imaging discrepancy. On the other hand, functional imaging discrepancy had no impact on treatment response (p = 0.43) or time-to-progression (p = 0.92). Conclusions: Intra-therapeutic 177Lu-octreotate imaging is superior over bone scintigraphy for detection of bone metastases in GEP NET. BS may help to distinguish osseous from non-osseous localization. The presence of an osteoblastic correlate in BS seems to have no impact on therapeutic outcome

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.