Organizing associational power: A strikers’ inquiry into the 2022 UAW strike against the University of California

The authors present an overview of the educational programs, infrastructure to support them, and the assessment strategies of 128 medical schools in the United States and Canada, based on reports submitted by those schools and published in this supplement to Academic Medicine. The authors explore many important changes that have occurred since the publication of the Flexner Report in 1910 as well as the progress that is evident since a similar collection of medical school reports was published in September 2000, also as a supplement to Academic Medicine. Drawing on the reports, the authors summarize, among other topics, the advances that have taken place in the support for faculty, the funding of medical student education, changes in pedagogy and assessment, and the expansion of medical education to distributed models and regional campuses.The authors observe that the reports from the 128 schools illustrate that medical student education has undergone and continues to undergo substantive change, has advanced markedly since the reforms stimulated by the Flexner Report, and has continued to evolve during the past decade. The reports illustrate the strength of support for the educational programs, even in a time of financial constraints, and the increasing recognition of the scholarly contributions of faculty through teaching. The authors provide examples of the changes in pedagogy and new topics in the required curriculum in the past decade and describe selected highlights of the 128 educational programs.

The Prevalence of Urinary Incontinence Among Community Dwelling Men: Results From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Additional informationNotes on contributorsMitchell J. ChangMitchell J. Chang is Associate Professor of Higher Education & Organizational Change at the University of California, Los Angeles. Nida Denson is a doctoral student in the Department of Education at the University of California, Los Angeles. Victor Sáenz is a doctoral student in the Department of Education at the University of California, Los Angeles. Kimberly Misa is a doctoral student in the Department of Education at the University of California, Los Angeles.Nida DensonMitchell J. Chang is Associate Professor of Higher Education & Organizational Change at the University of California, Los Angeles. Nida Denson is a doctoral student in the Department of Education at the University of California, Los Angeles. Victor Sáenz is a doctoral student in the Department of Education at the University of California, Los Angeles. Kimberly Misa is a doctoral student in the Department of Education at the University of California, Los Angeles.Victor SáenzMitchell J. Chang is Associate Professor of Higher Education & Organizational Change at the University of California, Los Angeles. Nida Denson is a doctoral student in the Department of Education at the University of California, Los Angeles. Victor Sáenz is a doctoral student in the Department of Education at the University of California, Los Angeles. Kimberly Misa is a doctoral student in the Department of Education at the University of California, Los Angeles.Kimberly MisaMitchell J. Chang is Associate Professor of Higher Education & Organizational Change at the University of California, Los Angeles. Nida Denson is a doctoral student in the Department of Education at the University of California, Los Angeles. Victor Sáenz is a doctoral student in the Department of Education at the University of California, Los Angeles. Kimberly Misa is a doctoral student in the Department of Education at the University of California, Los Angeles.

Notes on Contributors

1. Seymour de Ricci and W. J. Wilson, Census of Medieval and Renaissance Manuscripts in the United States and Canada (1935; repr. New York: Kraus Reprint Corp., 1961), and C. U. Faye and W. H. Bond, Supplement to the Census of Medieval and Renaissance Manuscripts in the United States and Canada (New York: Bibliographical Society of America, 1962). For background on the production of the Census and Supplement see: Herbert Putnam and J. F. Jameson, Introductory Note,

The article, based on the analysis of historical and pedagogical sources, found that the content of educational and methodological provision for students of institutions of higher education has much in common in the coverage of the history of Ukrainian pedagogy, the genesis of Ukrainian school, taking into account the achievements and trends; in determining the theoretical and methodological foundations of the history of Ukrainian pedagogy as a science; in substantiation of the substantive aspects of Ukrainian higher education within the chronological limits of a certain historical period through the prism of the general development of education. In the course of the comparative analysis of manuals and manuals on the history of pedagogy, published in Ukraine over the last twenty years, it is found that the content of the discipline in them is represented in three variants: the first covers the history of the formation of a foreign school and pedagogy XX; in the second, only the history of pedagogical thought and education in Ukraine; the third presents the history of the development of world pedagogical thought and the history of the development of the Ukrainian school and pedagogy. It is researched that the history of Ukrainian pedagogy is covered by the authors of manuals in general in the one-vector content range, in particular: the emergence and development of the Ukrainian family, family education, folk pedagogy and ethno-pedagogy, scientific-pedagogical theory and practice, educational and educational institutions of Ukraine from ancient times to the present. It is stated that the history of Ukrainian pedagogy as a powerful social-spiritual phenomenon has a rich and distinctive history, which deserves a thorough study in retrospect in order to activate its effective resources in the sphere of modern educational practice. Keywords: comparative analysis, histories of pedagogy as a discipline, textbooks and manuals, history of Ukrainian school and pedagogy.

Journal of the American Ceramic SocietyVolume 57, Issue 10 p. 460-460 Densification and Grain Growth in Doped LiFe5O8 Spinel G. BANDYOPADHYAY, G. BANDYOPADHYAY At the time this work was done, the writers were with the Inorganic Materials Research Division, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720. G. Bandyopadhyay is now with the Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, 1L 60439, and A. M. Lacy is with the University of California, San Francisco, CA 94122.Search for more papers by this authorM. LACY, M. LACY At the time this work was done, the writers were with the Inorganic Materials Research Division, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720. G. Bandyopadhyay is now with the Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, 1L 60439, and A. M. Lacy is with the University of California, San Francisco, CA 94122.Search for more papers by this authorR. M. FULRATH, R. M. FULRATH At the time this work was done, the writers were with the Inorganic Materials Research Division, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720. G. Bandyopadhyay is now with the Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, 1L 60439, and A. M. Lacy is with the University of California, San Francisco, CA 94122.Search for more papers by this author G. BANDYOPADHYAY, G. BANDYOPADHYAY At the time this work was done, the writers were with the Inorganic Materials Research Division, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720. G. Bandyopadhyay is now with the Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, 1L 60439, and A. M. Lacy is with the University of California, San Francisco, CA 94122.Search for more papers by this authorM. LACY, M. LACY At the time this work was done, the writers were with the Inorganic Materials Research Division, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720. G. Bandyopadhyay is now with the Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, 1L 60439, and A. M. Lacy is with the University of California, San Francisco, CA 94122.Search for more papers by this authorR. M. FULRATH, R. M. FULRATH At the time this work was done, the writers were with the Inorganic Materials Research Division, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720. G. Bandyopadhyay is now with the Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, 1L 60439, and A. M. Lacy is with the University of California, San Francisco, CA 94122.Search for more papers by this author First published: October 1974 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1974.tb11387.xCitations: 4 This work was done under the auspices of the United States Atomic Energy Commission. AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL No abstract is available for this article.Citing Literature Volume57, Issue10October 1974Pages 460-460 RelatedInformation

Previous article FreeNotes on ContributorsNotes on ContributorsPDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailQR Code SectionsMoreBrooke Abounader is a Ph.D. candidate at the Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology at the University of Toronto. She studies the role of representational inaccuracy in scientific modeling.Anna Akasoy, British Academy Postdoctoral Fellow at the Oriental Institute at Oxford, specializes in the intellectual and cultural history of the medieval Muslim West, contacts between the Islamic world and other cultures, and the role of Islamic history and culture in modern political debates in Western Europe.Garland E. Allen is Professor of Biology at Washington University in St. Louis. He has a special interest in the history of genetics (and eugenics), evolution, and embryology and their interactions in the first half of the twentieth century.Casper Andersen is an assistant professor at the University of Aarhus, Denmark. His main area of research is history of science, technology, and empires. His publications include the monograph British Engineers and Africa, 1875–1914 (2011), and he is coediting the forthcoming five-volume collection British Governance and Administration in Africa, 1880–1940 (2013).Warwick Anderson is Australian Research Council Laureate Fellow and Professor in the Department of History and the Centre for Values, Ethics, and the Law in Medicine at the University of Sydney. He is the author of The Collectors of Lost Souls: Turning Kuru Scientists into Whitemen (Johns Hopkins, 2008) and coeditor of Unconscious Dominions: Psychoanalysis, Colonial Trauma, and Postcolonial Sovereignties (Duke, 2011). His current research explores the global history of scientific investigations of race mixing in the twentieth century.Peder Anker is an associate professor at the Gallatin School of Individualized Study and in the Environmental Studies Program at New York University. His works include Imperial Ecology: Environmental Order in the British Empire, 1895–1945 (Harvard University Press, 2001), and From Bauhaus to Eco-House: A History of Ecological Design (Louisiana State University Press, 2010). See www.pederanker.com.Ross Bassett is Associate Professor of History at North Carolina State University. He is working on a history of Indians who studied at MIT.Jakob Bek-Thomsen has a postdoctoral position at the Department of Culture and Society, Aarhus University. He has recently finished his Ph.D. dissertation, entitled “Nicolaus Steno and the Making of an Early Modern Career: Nature, Knowledge, and Networks at the Court of the Medici, 1657–1672.” He is currently working on the emergence of finance and its connections with natural philosophy and religion in the early modern period.Jim Bennett is Director of the Museum of the History of Science in Oxford. His research interests lie in the history of instruments, of practical mathematics, and of astronomy.Marvin Bolt, Director of the Webster Institute at the Adler Planetarium in Chicago, is authoring the Adler's Optical Instruments catalogue. He served on the editorial team of the Biographical Encyclopedia of Astronomers, studies the Herschel family, and researches the history of the telescope, early seventeenth-century examples in particular.Christian Bonah is Professor for the History of Medical and Health Sciences at the University of Strasbourg and a member of the Institut Universitaire de France. He has worked on comparative history of medical education, the history of medicaments, and the history of human experimentation. Recent work includes research on risk perception and management in drug scandals as well as studies on medical films.Sonja Brentjes is currently a researcher in a “project of excellence” sponsored by the Junta of Andalusia at the Department of Philosophy, Logic, and History of Science of the University of Seville. She publishes on three major topics: Arabic and Persian versions of Euclid's Elements, the mathematical sciences at madrasas in Islamic societies before 1700, and cross-cultural exchange of knowledge in the medieval and early modern Mediterranean.Thomas Broman is Professor and Chair of the Department of History of Science at the University of Wisconsin–Madison. His research interests include eighteenth-century science and medicine, and he is currently writing a survey of science in the Enlightenment.Massimo Bucciantini is Professor of History of Science at the University of Siena. He is coeditor, with Michele Camerota, of Galilaeana: Journal of Galileo Studies. His publications include Galileo e Keplero (Einaudi, 2003; Les Belles Lettres, 2008), Italo Calvino e la scienza (Donzelli, 2007), and Auschwitz Experiment (Einaudi, 2011).Andrew J. Butrica, a former Chercheur Associé at the Centre de Recherches en Histoire des Sciences et Techniques in Paris, has published extensively on space history and has earned the Leopold Prize of the Organization of American Historians and the Robinson Prize of the National Council on Public History.Stefano Caroti is a professor in the Department of Philosophy at the University of Parma. His research interests include late medieval philosophy, particularly late scholastic debates on natural philosophy at the University of Paris.Chu Pingyi is a Research Fellow at the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica, Taiwan. He has published widely on appropriations of Jesuit science and natural philosophy by their Chinese readers in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century China.J. T. H. Connor is John Clinch Professor of Medical Humanities and History of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, Newfoundland, Canada. He is currently coeditor of the McGill-Queen's University Press History of Health, Medicine, and Society series. His latest book, a collection of essays coedited with Stephan Curtis entitled Medicine in the Remote and Rural North, 1800–2000, was published in 2011 by Pickering & Chatto in the Studies for the Society for the Social History of Medicine series.Scott DeGregorio is Associate Professor of English Literature at the University of Michigan–Dearborn. He specializes in Anglo-Saxon and Anglo-Latin literature, with a special focus on the Bible and its interpretation. He has published widely on the writings of Bede, most recently editing The Cambridge Companion to Bede.Michael Dettelbach has published widely on Alexander von Humboldt and is generally interested in science and culture in the revolutionary and Romantic eras. He directs Corporate and Foundation Relations at Boston University.Nadja Durbach is Associate Professor of History at the University of Utah. She is the author of Bodily Matters: The Anti-Vaccination Movement in England and Spectacle of Deformity: Freak Shows and Modern British Culture. She is now working on a book about beef, citizenship, and identity in modern Britain.David Edgerton is the Hans Rausing Professor, Centre for the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine, Imperial College London. His most recent book is Britain's War Machine: Weapons, Resources, and Experts in the Second World War (London: Allen Lane, 2011; New York: Oxford University Press, 2011).Paula Findlen is Ubaldo Pierotti Professor of Italian History at Stanford University. Her publications include Possessing Nature: Museums, Collecting, and Scientific Culture in Early Modern Italy (California, 1994), and she has a long-standing interest in the relations between knowledge and faith in the age of Galileo.Maurice A. Finocchiaro is Distinguished Professor of Philosophy, Emeritus, at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. His latest books are The Essential Galileo (Hackett, 2008) and Defending Copernicus and Galileo: Critical Reasoning in the Two Affairs (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 280) (Springer, 2010). He is now working on the Routledge Guidebook to Galileo's Dialogue.Mike Fortun is an associate professor in the Department of Science and Technology Studies at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and the author of Promising Genomics: Iceland and deCODE Genetics in a World of Speculation (University of California Press, 2008).Stephen Gaukroger is Professor of History of Philosophy and History of Science at the University of Sydney and Professor of Philosophy at the University of Aberdeen. Among his recent publications are The Emergence of a Scientific Culture: Science and the Shaping of Modernity, 1210 to 1685 (Oxford University Press, 2005), and The Collapse of Mechanism and the Rise of Sensibility: Science and the Shaping of Modernity, 1680 to 1760 (Oxford University Press, 2010). He is now at work on the third volume in this series: The Naturalization of the Human and the Humanization of Nature: Science and the Shaping of Modernity, 1750 to 1825.Thomas F. Glick is Professor of History at Boston University. His two research fields are medieval technology (irrigation systems, water mills) and modern science (Darwin, Freud, and Einstein).Susana Gómez is Professor of History and Philosophy of Science at the Universidad Complutense de Madrid. She is a specialist in seventeenth-century Italian science, with particular interests in atomism and experimental science. Much of her current work concerns issues about the representation of nature in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries.Frederick Gregory is Emeritus Professor of History of Science at the University of Florida. His research has dealt with the history of science and religion and with German science in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. He is currently engaged in writing a biography of the nineteenth-century Moravian physicist-philosopher Jakob Friedrich Fries.David E. Hahm is Professor Emeritus of Greek and Latin at the Ohio State University. He is the author of The Origins of Stoic Cosmology and articles on Greek and Roman intellectual and cultural history, especially Hellenistic philosophy and historiography.Minghui Hu served as an Andrew Mellon Postdoctoral Fellow at the University of Chicago from 2003 to 2005. He joined the Department of History at the University of California, Santa Cruz, in 2005 and is now completing his book manuscript Cosmopolitan Confucians: The Passage to Modern Chinese Thought.Jeffrey Allan Johnson, Professor of History at Villanova University, has published mainly on the social and institutional history of chemical science and technology in modern Germany. Recently he was guest editor for Ambix, 2011, 58(2), a special issue on “Chemistry in the Aftermath of World Wars.”Jessica Keating is a Solmsen Fellow in the Institute for Research in the Humanities at the University of Wisconsin–Madison. She is writing a book entitled The Machinations of German Court Culture: Early Modern Automata.Peter C. Kjærgaard is Professor of Evolutionary Studies at Aarhus University. He has published widely in the history of modern science, including books on Wittgenstein and the sciences, the history of universities, and the history of science in Denmark. His current research focuses on the history and popular understanding of human evolution.David Knight has taught history of science at Durham University in England since 1964 and is a past President of the British Society for the History of Science. He published The Making of Modern Science in 2009 (Polity) and is writing a book on the Scientific Revolution.Bernard Lightman is Professor of Humanities at York University, where he is Director of the Institute for Science and Technology Studies. He is also the Editor of the History of Science Society's flagship journal, Isis. His most recent publications include Victorian Popularizers of Science, Evolutionary Naturalism in Victorian Britain, and Science in the Marketplace (coedited with Aileen Fyfe). He is also general editor of a monograph series titled “Science and Culture in the Nineteenth Century” published by Pickering & Chatto. He is currently working on a biography of John Tyndall and is one of the editors of the John Tyndall Correspondence Project, an international collaborative effort to obtain, digitalize, transcribe, and publish all surviving letters to and from Tyndall.Pamela O. Long is a historian of late medieval/early modern history of science and technology. She is the coeditor and coauthor of The Book of Michael of Rhodes: A Fifteenth-Century Maritime Manuscript (MIT Press, 2009). Her books include Artisan/Practitioners and the Rise of the New Sciences, 1400–1600 (Oregon State University Press, 2011). She is at work on a history of engineering and knowledge in late sixteenth-century Rome.Morris Low is an associate professor of Japanese history at the University of Queensland, where he is Acting Head of the School of Languages and Comparative Cultural Studies. He coedited a special issue of Historia Scientiarum (2011, 21[1]), and his recent books include Japan on Display (2006).Christine MacLeod is Professor Emerita of History at the University of Bristol. She is the author of Heroes of Invention: Technology, Liberalism, and British Identity, 1750–1914 (Cambridge University Press, 2007), and Inventing the Industrial Revolution: The English Patent System, 1660–1800 (Cambridge University Press, 1988).Paolo Mancosu is Professor and Chair of Philosophy at the University of California, Berkeley. His main areas of interest are mathematical logic and history and philosophy of mathematics and logic. His current work is focused on the philosophy of mathematical practice. He has been a Guggenheim Fellow (2008) and a member of the Institute for Advanced Study (2009).Hannah Marcus is a doctoral student studying history and the history of science at Stanford University. She is interested in the relationship between intellectual and religious culture in sixteenth- and seventeenth-century Italy.David Meskill is an assistant professor of history at Dowling College on Long Island. His book Optimizing the German Workforce: Labor Administration from Bismarck to the Economic Miracle was published by Berghahn Books in 2010.John Pickstone is Wellcome Research Professor in the University of Manchester Centre for the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine. His publications include Ways of Knowing: A New History of Science, Technology, and Medicine (Manchester University Press, 2000) and The Modern Biological and Earth Sciences, Volume 6 of the Cambridge History of Science (edited with Peter Bowler) (Cambridge University Press, 2009).Matthias Rieger is a postdoctoral research fellow in the Department of Sociology, Leibniz University, Hannover, and the author of Helmholtz Musicus: Die Objektivierung der Musik im 19. Jahrhundert durch Helmholtz' Lehre von den Tonempfindungen (Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 2006).Joy Rohde is Assistant Professor of History at Trinity University in San Antonio. Her research focuses on Cold War social science and politics. She is completing a book, under contract with Cornell University Press, titled The Social Scientists' War: Knowledge, Statecraft, and Democracy in the Era of Containment.William G. Rothstein is Professor of Sociology in the Department of Sociology and Anthropology at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County. He is the author of several books on American medical history, most recently Public Health and the Risk Factor (2003).Lisa T. Sarasohn is Professor of History at Oregon State University. Her latest publication is The Natural Philosophy of Margaret Cavendish: Reason and Fancy during the Scientific Revolution (Johns Hopkins, 2010). She is working on a cultural history of insects in early modern England.Arne Schirrmacher teaches history of science at the Humboldt University in Berlin and is currently on leave at the University of California, Berkeley. His research concerns the history of the modern mathematical sciences, in particular quantum theory, the history of scientific socialization within student groups in Germany since 1850, and science communication in twentieth-century Europe.Petra G. Schmidl specialized in premodern astronomy in Islamic societies. Since 2009, she has worked as a research assistant at the University of Bonn. With Eva Orthmann and Mo˙hammad Karīmī Zanjānī A˙sl, she is investigating the Dustūr al-Munajjimīn as a source for the history of the Ismāʿīliyya and their astronomical and astrological concepts.Charlotte Schubert is Professor of Ancient History at the University of Leipzig. Her publications include Anacharsis der Weise: Nomade, Skythe, Grieche (2010), Der hippokratische Eid (2005), Hippokrates (coedited, 2006), and Frauenmedizin in der Antike (coedited, 1999).Vera Schwach is a historian and senior researcher at the Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research, and Higher Education (NIFU). She has published analyses in science policy and has written extensively on the history of marine science, especially on fisheries biology and the management of sea fisheries in the Nordic countries and in Europe.Jonathan Seitz is an assistant teaching professor of history at Drexel University. He is particularly interested in vernacular ideas about nature and the supernatural in early modern Europe. His book, Witchcraft and Inquisition in Early Modern Venice, was published in 2011 by Cambridge University Press.Helaine Selin is Science Librarian and Faculty Associate in the School of Natural Sciences at Hampshire College. Her work includes editing The Encyclopaedia of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine in Non-Western Cultures (Springer, 2008) and the series Science Across Cultures. Happiness Across Cultures is due out in Spring 2012.Efram Sera-Shriar received his Ph.D. in history and philosophy of science from the University of Leeds. He is now working as a research associate on the John Tyndall Correspondence Project, organized by Montana State University and York University in Toronto.Asif A. Siddiqi is an associate professor of history at Fordham University. His most recent book is The Red Rockets' Glare: Spaceflight and the Soviet Imagination, 1857–1957 (Cambridge University Press, 2010). He is now writing a book on the effects of the Stalinist purges on Soviet science and technology.Mark G. Spencer is Associate Professor of History at Brock University. His book, David Hume and Eighteenth-Century America (University of Rochester Press, 2005), was issued in a paperback edition in 2010. He is also current President of the Eighteenth-Century Scottish Studies Society.Matthew Stanley is an associate professor at New York University's Gallatin School of Individualized Study, where he teaches and researches the history and philosophy of science. He is the author of Practical Mystic: Religion, Science, and A. S. Eddington (Chicago, 2007), and he is now completing a manuscript on the history of science and religion in the Victorian period.John Steele is Associate Professor of Egyptology and Ancient Western Asian Studies at Brown University. His recent publications include A Brief Introduction to Astronomy in the Middle East (Saqi Books, 2008) and Ancient Astronomical Observations and the Study of the Moon's Motion (1691–1757) (Springer, 2012). He is currently working on an edition and commentary of a newly discovered astrological compendium from Babylon.Larry Stewart is Professor of History at the University of Saskatchewan. He is editing a book on the uses of humans in experiment and writing a study of experiment in the Enlightenment and the first industrial revolution.Bert Theunissen is Professor of the History of Science at the Institute for History and Foundations of Science, affiliated with the Descartes Centre for the History of the Sciences and the Humanities at Utrecht University, the Netherlands. His current work focuses on the history of animal breeding, particularly on the interactions between scientific and practical workers in livestock breeding in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. For his publications see http://www.descartescentre.com.Carsten Timmermann is a lecturer at the Centre for the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine at the University of Manchester. His research and teaching focus on issues in the history of modern medicine and biology, including chronic disease, cancer research, and pharmaceuticals.The Rev. Jeffrey P. von Arx, S.J., became the eighth President of Fairfield University in 2004. A historian by discipline, he is the author of numerous articles as well as the books Progress and Pessimism: Religion, Politics, and History in Late Nineteenth-Century Britain (Harvard University Press, 1985) and Varieties of Ultramontanism (Catholic University Press, 1998). He is a Fellow of the Royal Historical Society.Michael Worboys is Director of the Centre for the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine and the Wellcome Unit for the History of Medicine at the University of Manchester. He specializes in the history of infectious diseases as well as the application of research in clinical practices. He has recently started new work on dog breeding, feeding, training, and welfare from the mid-nineteenth century to the present. His publications include Mad Dogs and Englishmen: Rabies in Britain, 1830–2000 (with Neil Pemberton), and Spreading Germs: Disease Theories and Medical Practice in Britain, 1865–1900. Previous article DetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Isis Volume 103, Number 2June 2012 Publication of the History of Science Society Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/666369 © 2012 by The History of Science Society. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.

Most climate change mitigation policies, including those of higher education institutions, do not include food system greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE). Yet the food system contributes ∼30% of anthropogenic GHGE, mostly from animal source foods. Food system changes are necessary to meet GHGE mitigation targets and could do so relatively inexpensively and rapidly with major health, social and environmental co-benefits. To estimate the potential impact of integrating higher education institution climate and food policies, we used the case of the University of California (UC), comprising 10 campuses with 280,000 students. The UC is a leader in climate and food research, and has major policy initiatives for mitigating climate change and for promoting healthy, sustainable food systems. Like most higher education institutions, the UC climate change mitigation target for 2025 covers only Scope 1 and 2 GHGE (campus-generated and purchased energy), yet Scope 3 GHGE (indirect, including food system) are often institutions’ largest. We created scenarios using results of studies of US dietary changes, and existing, planned or potential UC food system changes. These scenarios could reduce UC Scope 3 food emissions by 42–55%, equivalent to 8–9% of UC’s targeted energy GHGE reduction, and 19–22% of offsets need to reach that target. These results have implications for broader climate policy in terms of food systems’ high GHGE, the health, environmental, economic and social benefits of food system changes, and ways these changes could be implemented. To our knowledge this is one of the first empirical studies of the potential for integrating climate and food policy in HEIs. Key policy insights Most higher education institution climate policies, including those of the University of California (UC), do not include food system GHGE Research at higher education institutions makes major contributions to understanding the need to reduce food system GHGE to achieve Paris Agreement goals Higher education institutions, including UC, have made many food system changes, but their climate co-benefits are not optimized, documented or integrated with climate policies Our food system change scenarios show that UC’s food system could substantially reduce GHGE These changes can incentivize UC and other higher education institutions to integrate their climate and food policies.

Scaling Up Pharmacist-Led Blood Pressure Control Programs in Black Barbershops: Projected Population Health Impact and Value.

Magnetic Resonance in ChemistryVolume 52, Issue 6 p. 310-317 Letter - spectral assignment 1H and 13C NMR spectral assignments of halogenated transformation products of pharmaceuticals and related environmental contaminants Kemal Solakyildirim, Kemal Solakyildirim Department of Chemistry, University of California – Riverside, Riverside, CA, 92521 United StatesSearch for more papers by this authorDaryl N. Bulloch, Daryl N. Bulloch Department of Chemistry, University of California – Riverside, Riverside, CA, 92521 United StatesSearch for more papers by this authorCynthia K. Larive, Corresponding Author Cynthia K. Larive Department of Chemistry, University of California – Riverside, Riverside, CA, 92521 United StatesCorrespondence to: Cynthia K. Larive, Department of Chemistry, University of California – Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, United States. E-mail: clarive@ucr.eduSearch for more papers by this author Kemal Solakyildirim, Kemal Solakyildirim Department of Chemistry, University of California – Riverside, Riverside, CA, 92521 United StatesSearch for more papers by this authorDaryl N. Bulloch, Daryl N. Bulloch Department of Chemistry, University of California – Riverside, Riverside, CA, 92521 United StatesSearch for more papers by this authorCynthia K. Larive, Corresponding Author Cynthia K. Larive Department of Chemistry, University of California – Riverside, Riverside, CA, 92521 United StatesCorrespondence to: Cynthia K. Larive, Department of Chemistry, University of California – Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, United States. E-mail: clarive@ucr.eduSearch for more papers by this author First published: 01 April 2014 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrc.4056Citations: 7Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat Citing Literature Volume52, Issue6June 2014Pages 310-317 RelatedInformation

Annals of the New York Academy of SciencesVolume 222, Issue 1 p. 324-336 HIGH-RESOLUTION NMR INVESTIGATION OF BASE PAIRING STRUCTURE OF TRANSFER RNA * D. R. Kearns, D. R. Kearns Department of Chemistry, University of California, Riverside, California.Search for more papers by this authorD. R. Lightfoot, D. R. Lightfoot Department of Biochemistry, University of California, Riverside, California.Search for more papers by this authorK. L. Wong, K. L. Wong Department of Chemistry, University of California, Riverside, California.Search for more papers by this authorY. P. Wong, Y. P. Wong Department of Chemistry, University of California, Riverside, California.Search for more papers by this authorB. R. Reid, B. R. Reid Department of Biochemistry, University of California, Riverside, California.Search for more papers by this authorL. Cary, L. Cary Varian Associates, Palo Alto, California.Search for more papers by this authorR. G. Shulman, R. G. Shulman Bell Telephone Laboratories, Murray Hill, New Jersey.Search for more papers by this author D. R. Kearns, D. R. Kearns Department of Chemistry, University of California, Riverside, California.Search for more papers by this authorD. R. Lightfoot, D. R. Lightfoot Department of Biochemistry, University of California, Riverside, California.Search for more papers by this authorK. L. Wong, K. L. Wong Department of Chemistry, University of California, Riverside, California.Search for more papers by this authorY. P. Wong, Y. P. Wong Department of Chemistry, University of California, Riverside, California.Search for more papers by this authorB. R. Reid, B. R. Reid Department of Biochemistry, University of California, Riverside, California.Search for more papers by this authorL. Cary, L. Cary Varian Associates, Palo Alto, California.Search for more papers by this authorR. G. Shulman, R. G. Shulman Bell Telephone Laboratories, Murray Hill, New Jersey.Search for more papers by this author First published: December 1973 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1973.tb15271.xCitations: 15 * This work was supported by grants GM 19313 (to D.R.K.) and CA 11697 (to B.R.R.) from the United States Public Health Service. AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat Citing Literature Volume222, Issue1Electron Spin Resonance and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in Biology and Medicine and Magnetic Resonance in Biological SystemsDecember 1973Pages 324-336 RelatedInformation

Reviewed by: Improving Completion Rates Among Disadvantaged Students Juan R. Guardia Improving Completion Rates Among Disadvantaged Students Liz Thomas, Michael Cooper, and Jocey Quinn (Eds.) Stoke on Trent, U.K.: Trentham Books, 2003, 176 pages, $27.50 (softcover) What are colleges and universities across the globe doing to assist disadvantaged students? What can be done to improve their retention and graduation rates in higher education? The answers to these and other related questions are found in Improving Completion Rates Among Disadvantaged Students. Editors Thomas, Cooper and Quinn gathered a group of 14 higher education professionals from around the world, including Mike Abramson, Helen Anderson, Margaret Andrews, John Benseman, David Coltman, Kay Gardner, Stephen J. Handel, Margaret Heagney, Alfred Herrera, Peter Jones, Patricia McLean, Judy Nicholl, Margaret Noble, and Vincent Tinto, who have substantial experience working with access, attrition and retention programs to contribute to this volume. Although they all originate in countries dominated by the Anglo-Saxon culture, they have a general validity dealing as they do with central issues that have to be addressed if we are to come to terms with the problem of drop-out. (p. xiii) The book is organized into eight chapters. In the first, "Establishing Conditions for Student Success," Tinto describes four factors that contribute to student retention at colleges and universities in the United States (U.S.): (1) institutional commitment, (2) academic and social support, (3) involvement, and (4) learning. "Students are more likely to persist when they find themselves in settings that hold high expectations for their learning, provide needed academic and social support, and actively involve them with other students and faculty in learning" (p. 5). In addition, Tinto describes the importance of federal and state programs targeted at disadvantaged students and how institutions are being held accountable for student retention and graduation. In chapter two, "The Implications of Globalisation for Supporting Students with a Disability: An Australian Perspective," McLean, Heagney, and Gardner introduce us to their work with students with disabilities in Australia. Many of Australia's universities employ Disability Liasion Officers who provide services for disabled students, including those planning to study abroad and international students with disabilities studying in Australia. We also learn about the culture clash experienced by international students with disabilities and how Australia's Federal Disability Discrimination Act of 1992 and the federal government's equity blueprint, A Fair Chance for All: Education That's Within Everyone's Reach, play an important role in Australian higher education. Chapter three, "Access and Retention of Students from Educationally Disadvantaged Backgrounds: Insights from the University of California" provides readers with a U.S. perspective and describes how the University of California (UC) system addressed the issue of diversity on campus after Proposition 209 prohibited the use of race in admissions in state agencies. Handel and Herrera describe how UC created an Outreach Task Force (OTF) in charge of developing new ways of attracting disadvantaged students to UC [End Page 99] campuses. One of their initial findings included how "a significant number of underrepresented students attend a California Community College yet never transfer to a UC campus" (p. 38). The University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) responded with the creation of the Centre for Community College Partnerships, which "develop academic partnerships among UCLA and community college faculty and administrators to increase the number of underrepresented students who apply and are admitted to the University of California" (p. 44). UCLA also offers the Summer Intensive Transfer Experience (SITE), a six-day academic program for educationally disadvantaged, low-income, first-generation, underrepresented community college students, which prepares them to transfer to a four-year institution (Handel & Herrera, 2003). In chapter four, Andrews discusses "Access and Learner-centred Approaches to Teaching and Learning in Further and Higher Education." The chapter focuses on a qualitative study of students, teachers, and staff who participate in programs targeted at disadvantaged groups, including women, Black and ethnic minorities, and lower-socioeconomic groups at two further education colleges and two universities in London. Further education colleges are "voluntary and private training organizations usually at sub-degree levels" (p. 54) and higher education is referred to mainstream universities. Results found that further education colleges are more consistent in...

Analyzing Offense Patterns as a Function of Mental Illness to Test the Criminalization Hypothesis

Role Model Effects of Female Stem Teachers and Doctors on Early 20th Century University Enrollment in California