Abstract

BackgroundWhen death occurs through a mechanism requiring a forensic investigation, consent for organ harvesting must be sought from the Judicial Authority (JA). AimTo perform a retrospective study of potential organ donors in the Veneto region over a six-year period (2012–2017), analysing any differences between cases in which the JA approved or denied organ harvesting. Material and methodsBoth non-heart beating (NHB) and heart beating (HB) donors were included. For HB cases, personal and clinical data were collected. To evaluate the correlation between the JA response and the circumstantial and clinical data a logistic multivariate analysis was performed, estimating the adjusted odds ratios (adjORs). ResultsBetween 2012 and 2017, 17,662 organ and/or tissue donors were included, of which 16,418 were NHB donors and 1,244 HB-donors. Among the 1,244 HB-donors, JA authorization was asked in 200 cases (16.1%), approved in 154 cases (77.0%), limited in 7 cases (3.5%) and denied in 39 cases (19.5%). The JA denied the authorization for organ harvesting in 53,3% of cases with hospitalizations of less than 1 day and in 9,4% of cases with hospitalization exceeding one week [adjOR(95%CI) = 10.67 (1.92–59.22)]. The performance of an autopsy was linked to a higher chance of denied outcome from the JA [adjOR(95%CI): 3.45 (1.42–8.39)]. ConclusionsImprovements in the communication between organ procurement organizations and the JA through efficient protocols furnishing detailed information on the cause of death might lead to a better procurement process with an increase in the number of transplanted organs.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.