Abstract

Processing large amounts of image data such as the Sentinel-2 archive is a computationally demanding task. However, for most applications, many of the images in the archive are redundant and do not contribute to the quality of the final result. An optimization scheme is presented here that selects a subset of the Sentinel-2 archive in order to reduce the amount of processing, while retaining the quality of the resulting output. As a case study, we focused on the creation of a cloud-free composite, covering the global land mass and based on all the images acquired from January 2016 until September 2017. The total amount of available images was 2,128,556. The selection of the optimal subset was based on quicklooks, which correspond to a spatial and spectral subset of the original Sentinel-2 products and are lossy compressed. The selected subset contained 94,093 image tiles in total, reducing the amount of images to be processed to 4.42% of the full set.

Highlights

  • The Copernicus program of the European Commission (EC) with its Sentinel satellites produces approximately 10 TB of Earth Observation (EO) data per day

  • An optimization scheme is presented here that selects a subset of the Sentinel-2 archive in order to reduce the amount of processing, while retaining the quality of the resulting output

  • The selection of the optimal subset was based on quicklooks, which correspond to a spatial and spectral subset of the original Sentinel-2 products and are lossy compressed

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Copernicus program of the European Commission (EC) with its Sentinel satellites produces approximately 10 TB of Earth Observation (EO) data per day. This wealth of information, combined with a free full and open access policy, provides new opportunities for applications in forestry, agriculture, and climate change monitoring, to name a few. Instead of dealing with the original images at full resolution, the selection criterion is based on a sample only. The underlying idea is that the computational cost of the optimization function is considerably less than the processing algorithm that is needed to produce the application results.

Materials and infrastructure
Methods
Quality check
Optimization scheme
Results
Image tile selection
Processing performance and scalability
Conclusion and future outlook
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.