Abstract
The connection between an intake fan and a ventilation shaft must be designed in such a way that it minimizes the energy waste due to singularity losses. As a result, the questions of which radius of curvature to use and if guide vanes have to be included need to be answered. In that case, the variables such as the number, upstream and downstream penetration length, radius of curvature, and width of the vanes, need to be defined. Although this work is oriented to mine ventilation, these questions are usually valid in other engineering applications as well. The objective of this study is to define the previously mentioned variables to determine the optimal design combination for the radius/diameter relationship (r/D). Computational fluid dynamics was used to determine the shock loss factor of seven elbow curvature ratios for a 3 m diameter duct and fan, with and without guide vanes to estimate the best performing configuration and, therefore, to maximize the fan airflow volume. The methodology used consisted of initially developing models in 2D geometries, to optimize the meshing and the CPU use, and studying separately the number of vanes, upstream and downstream penetration, radius of curvature, and width of the vanes for each curvature ratio (r/D). Then, the best-performing variable combinations for each curvature ratio were selected to be simulated and studied with the 3D geometries. The application of the guide vane designs for three-dimensional simulated geometries is presented, first without and then with guide vanes, including the shock loss factors obtained. The methodology and obtained results allowed quantifying the energy savings and to reduce the CFD simulations steps required to optimize the design of the elbow and guide vanes. The results obtained cannot be used with elbows in exhaust fans, because fluid dynamics phenomena are different.
Highlights
The layout is usually constrained to a short distance between the fan and the shaft, due to the available footprint or the need to minimize capital expenditure, which produces significant shock losses resulting in energy waste
Kotb and Ward-Smith 1988 [6] point out that the main method to improve the performance of steep curves is to introduce one or more guide vanes, due to two main reasons: the first is to improve the shape of the velocity profile emerging from the elbow, reducing the peak velocities tending to an average; the second is to reduce the pressure gradient at the elbow between high and low pressures to tend to an average
The study of the guide vane is separated into three stages, where each one delivers sults, noused significant differences except forThese low Reynolds numbers
Summary
The performance of main fans located on the surface is limited by the elbow pressure loss because there are no more openings to help distribute the airflow in parallel and reduce the pressure loss This pressure loss directly increases the network resistance experienced by the intake fan. Turbulent flows at a 90◦ elbow can cause strong flow separation near the inner wall, which affects the performance of the duct system and can cause strong flow-induced vibrations and noise [1]. This effect is not observed in fans installed vertically in shafts or ventilation raises
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
