Abstract
The issues of verification by the court for the results of the parties’ conciliation activities are analyzed. The limits of the control activity of the court are determined when it approves the settlement agreement. The nature of reconciliation results is investigated in the context of specific types of conciliation procedures: mediation, negotiations, judicial mediation. As a result of the analysis of doctrine and judicial practice, the author concludes that it is expedient to transfer the authority to certify and legally examine the results of any conciliation procedures to a notary. This proposal is considered in the context of optimizing the civil process and reducing the burden on the judicial system.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
