Abstract
AbstractFaecal samples are an important source of genetic information for studies of wild animals. The quality and quantity of faecal DNA can, however, be affected by different factors. Our goal was to compare different dung sample storage and DNA extraction methods to optimise the quality and quantity of DNA extracted from forest elephant dung samples. Dung samples (n = 132) of forest elephants were collected in a forest area in Côte d'Ivoire. Each faecal sample was preserved in 50 mL cryotubes using five different methods: Ethanol 70%, formalin 10%, Sodium acetate, acetic acid, and formalin (SAF), dimethyl sulfoxide, and Sodium chloride (20% DMSO), and silica gel. We used the Cetyl Trimethyl Ammonium Bromide (CTAB) cationic detergent and the phenol chloroform DNA extraction procedures for comparison. DNA was successfully obtained from all 132 faecal samples using both DNA extraction methods. Regarding the total DNA extracted independently from the storage buffers, the phenol chloroform method yields a mean DNA concentration (2163.93 ± 918.62 ng/μL) sevenfold higher than that obtained with the optimised CTAB method (338.15 ± 528.54 ng/μL). Our study indicates optimised faecal sample storage and DNA extraction procedures that can help implement conservation strategies for forest elephants.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
