Abstract

Lack of adequate width and thickness of periodontal or peri-implant soft tissues can compromise the aesthetics, function or survival of teeth and dental implants. Biomaterials are widely used in dentistry to overcome the disadvantages of autogenous tissue transplantation. The advantage of using biomaterials is that there is no need for re-surgery and that they are available in large quantities. The most widely used biomaterial for soft tissue augmentation is collagen, as it is believed to best mimic the natural cellular environment of the extracellular matrix, although other biomaterials are also candidates for soft tissue regeneration. Collagen matrices differ in composition, three-dimensional structure, elasticity and mechanical stability. Aim. is to review the literature on the optimization of regeneration at the stages of soft tissue augmentation using a collagen matrix.

Highlights

  • The absence of keratinized gingiva around dental implants increases the susceptibility of peri-implant tissues to bacterial biofilm-induced alteration [1]

  • Does a lack of keratinized gingiva contribute to plaque accumulation around teeth and implants, but it can lead to soft tissue recession in the aesthetic zone

  • Studies showed that soft tissue recession around the implant might be the result of soft tissue remodeling around the dental implant

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The absence of keratinized gingiva around dental implants increases the susceptibility of peri-implant tissues to bacterial biofilm-induced alteration [1]. Does a lack of keratinized gingiva contribute to plaque accumulation around teeth and implants, but it can lead to soft tissue recession in the aesthetic zone. The presence of keratinized gingiva is closely related to optimal soft and hard tissue health. This is true for patients who maintain proper plaque formation control. Lack of keratinized gingiva was associated with plaque formation, greater soft tissue recession, and more areas that required additional surgical intervention. The above indicates that implants not surrounded by keratinized gingiva are more prone to plaque accumulation and soft tissue recession, despite adequate oral hygiene and supportive periodontal therapy [7]

Objectives
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.