Abstract
Recanalisation favourably influences outcome in acute stroke. Improved endovascular approaches seem to have higher recanalisation rates than systemic thrombolysis. Substantial efforts have been undertaken to increase the proportion of patients to whom these therapies can be applied. It is still unclear what rates can be realised in a clinical setting. This is a retrospective single-centre analysis of patients with acute ischaemic stroke and specific recanalisation therapy primarily admitted to our tertiary care centre from 1/2010 to 3/2012. 20 % of patients received systemic thrombolysis, 20 % of these additional endovascular strategies. Pathological multimodal CT patterns were more common in patients not fulfilling the inclusion criteria for thrombolysis. Short-term clinical outcomes were similar in on-label and off-label applications. Structured clinical pathways including multimodal CT imaging are useful in identifying patients likely to profit from revascularisation therapies. Based upon our data, some realistic aims concerning therapy rates in patients with ischaemic stroke treated in everyday practice may be formulated (20/20 in 2020).
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
