Abstract
Instant discounts and mail-in rebates are two common pricing tools in retail, but they are not simple substitutes. On the one hand, consumers discount the face value of a mail-in rebate, making it less effective than an instant discount in inducing consumers’ purchase. On the other hand, a portion of consumers with mail-in rebates fail to redeem them, resulting in savings for the retailer. We study how retailers, under pressure to move inventory, should use these two pricing tools to maximize revenue by determining the optimal use of mail-in rebates together with dynamic pricing of limited inventory. In a base model that allows frequent adjustment of product price and rebate face value, the optimal policy takes the form of “discount only,” “rebate only,” or a combination of the two. For useful heuristics with infrequent policy adjustment, we analyze the deterministic approximation of the base model. Interestingly, the deterministic solution splits the selling season into two segments, and it suggests using different pricing-rebate policies in each segment. Finally, we study a scenario in which the retailer has only one opportunity to introduce a static rebate, and we find that for any inventory level there is a cutoff time before which rebates should not be used. Our numerical studies show that such an optimal one-time static rebate policy performs well compared with the optimal revenue in the benchmark model. The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2017.1642 .
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.