Abstract
We examine the optimality of public long-term care policy, incorporating an exchange game between elderly parents and adult children and transfer-seeking competition among siblings, instead of children's altruism. Results reveal that when children compete to obtain more valuable bequests from parents in exchange for elderly care, public long-term care policy is optimal if government can provide long-term care more efficiently than children can, thereby reducing parental bequests, possibly to zero. This is likely to be the case when children's wages are high. Formal long-term care might not be necessary if parents can receive adequate informal care in exchange for bequests to children with low wages.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
