Abstract
Unless we resolve the P vs NP question, we are unable to say whether there is an algorithm (acceptor) that accepts Boolean tautologies in polynomial time and does not accept non-tautologies (with no time restriction). Unless we resolve the co-NP vs NP question, we are unable to say whether there is a proof system that has a polynomial-size proof for every tautology.In such a situation, it is typical for complexity theorists to search for “universal” objects; here, it could be the “fastest” acceptor (called optimal acceptor) and a proof system that has the “shortest” proof (called optimal proof system) for every tautology. Neither of these objects is known to the date.In this survey we review the connections between these questions and generalizations of acceptors and proof systems that lead or may lead to universal objects.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
