Abstract

Hypothesis/aims of study. The frequency of surgical abdominal delivery in Russia, as in the world, continues to grow, reaching 29.3% in 2017. Operative vaginal delivery is an alternative to abdominal delivery in the second stage of labor. This study was aimed at analyzing the outcome of labor for mothers and newborns using different operative vaginal delivery methods.
 Study design, materials and methods. We studied 293 cases of childbirth in the period from 2015 to 2018. Three groups were distinguished: (I) the main group consisting of 172 women delivered by the operation of applying obstetric forceps (OF); (II) the comparison group including 85 patients delivered by the operation of vacuum extraction (VE) with the fetal head being near the pelvic floor; and (III) the control group comprising 34 cases of vaginal birth without use of instrumental delivery. In group I, 114 patients were delivered by the low forceps operation (subgroup IA), and 60 individuals by the mid forceps operation (subgroup IB).
 Results. Vaginal lacerations were found in 21.3% of cases in group I, less often less often in groups II (10.6%, p 0.05) and III (2.9%, p 0.05). Vaginal hematoma occurred in one patient of group III (2.9%) and three women of group I (1.7%, p 0.05). There were no cases of damage to the anal sphincter. The greatest blood loss was recorded in subgroup IB (554 44.9 ml), when compared to subgroup IA (473 20.7 ml; p 0.05), group II (418 24.9 ml; p 0.05), and group III (347 33.4 ml; p 0.05). There were no differences in blood loss between the outlet OF and VE groups (p 0.05). Most newborns were born in good condition (84.5%, 77.6%, and 88.2% of cases in groups I, II, and III, respectively). Cephalohematoma in newborns was more common after VE (32.9%) than after OF (9.2%, p 0.01) and in control (5.9%, p 0.01). No retinal hemorrhage was recorded in newborns. There were no significant differences in the frequency of children being transferred to the childrens hospital (7.5%, 9.4%, and 8.8% of cases in groups I, II, and III, respectively; p 0.05).
 Conclusion. The use of OF is an effective and safe method of vaginal operative delivery. It does not increase the fetal injury rate, the frequency of newborn cephalohematoma being 3.5 times less than with VE. Complications of OF and VE (except for a greater number of vaginal lacerations in cases of OF), blood loss, and the course and duration of the postpartum stay in the maternity ward are comparable.

Highlights

  • The frequency of operative abdominal delivery throughout the world continues to grow, so its tendency is consistent with the epidemic

  • There were no significant differences in the structure of extragenital pathology, and this characteristic was insignificant for the delivery termination option

  • Unlike vacuum-assisted delivery (VAS), it is associated with a reduced risk of cephalohematoma in the fetus

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The frequency of operative abdominal delivery throughout the world continues to grow, so its tendency is consistent with the epidemic. The rate of abdominal delivery worldwide is 21% and ranges from 5% in South Africa to 60% in South America [1]. For an objective assessment of indications for surgery and optimization of the structure of abdominal delivery, Robson’s classification was developed [3]. It has been established that with an increase in the frequency of cesarean section surgery by over 9%–16%, maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality do not decrease [4]. It is possible to reduce the number of cesarean section surgeries and thereby decrease the level of postoperative complications for puerperae and adverse outcomes for newborns through a thorough analysis and a differentiated approach to a planned abdominal delivery

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.