Abstract

Posterior dislocations of the shoulder are rare, comprising only 4% of shoulder dislocations. Several operative procedures have been described in treating recurrent dislocations, and results have been varied. A retrospective review of eight shoulders in eight patients treated by posterior glenoidplasty with capsulorrhaphy and infraspinatus advancement revealed generally good results. Followup ranged from 10 to 114 months, with an average of 36 months. Seven patients were classified as recurrent traumatic dislocators and one as a recurrent atraumatic voluntary dislocator. Results graded as good, fair, and failure were based on pain, range of motion, return to activities, recurrence, and roentgenograms. Six patients had good results with return to full activity, full range of motion, no pain, no recurrence, and no degenerative changes of roentgenograms. One patient, who has not returned to athletic activities and has occasional pain and limited range of motion, was graded as a fair result. The patient classified as an atraumatic voluntary dislocator has occasional feelings of instability and slight pain with strenuous activity, but has not had a recurrence and has no difficulty with activities of daily living. She was also classified as a fair result. There have been no recurrences or degenerative changes on followup radiographs. Computerized tomography performed on two patients documented a definite change in orientation of the glenoid. We feel that glenoidplasty with capsular reefing and infraspinatus advancement, if performed carefully, provides an excellent operative treatment for recurrent posterior dislocations of the shoulder.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.