Abstract

Treatment of periprosthetic femur fractures often requires deviation from standard fixation techniques due to the presence of associated arthroplasty components, however, the use of adjuvant bone grafts and bone graft substitutes remain controversial. 59 patients (average age, 74 years) with either a periprosthetic femoral shaft about an arthroplasty stem (n=29) or supracondylar fracture above a total knee arthroplasty (n=30) were treated with biological open-reduction internal-fixation techniques without the use of bone grafts or bone-graft substitutes. All except one patient healed after the index procedure. Three patients had progressive malalignment associated with failed screw fixation but all healed without further surgical intervention. 49 out of the 59 patients returned to their baseline level of function. These results indicate that use of adjuvant bone graft materials may not be routinely necessary when treating periprosthetic femur fractures using lateral plates and biological reduction and fixation techniques.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.