Abstract

Soviet historians long ago abandoned the simplistic approach to study of the Russian town characteristic of bourgeois historiography. In contrast to the approach taken in the writings of someone like I. Ditiatin — who considered Rus' to have had few real towns but rather (in the majority of cases) strange settlements bearing the name ‘town’ due to some sort of misunderstanding (1) — contemporary historiography is characterized by a more multifaceted approach to the town — an identification of towns with a variety of socioeconomic functions (industrial centers, centers of transit trade, administrative centers of internal colonization, and so forth). Yet, at the same time one still encounters in writings on the history of the Russian town a not entirely successful definition of types of urban communities and a classification of towns reminiscent of the earlier approach. In particular, in the literature there is a special category of the undeveloped or agrarian type of town. (2) To this very large group ...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.