Abstract
abstractAs MS, mb, or unified magnitude approaches 8, there is an abrupt change in the rate at which frequency of occurrence decreases with magnitude. This change is not observed for moment-magnitude, MW. Data on past earthquakes are insufficient to prove whether there is a finite upper limit on MS, mb, or unified magnitude or whether earthquake probability is better described by an unlimited logarithmic relation of the formM = E + F ( I n ( G − I n ( − I n probability ) ) ) .This empirical equation, however, fits the world data best.If there is an upper limit on size, it is approximately 8.1 for mb, 8.7 for MS, and 8.9 for unified magnitude.For regions such as the contiguous United States and Alaska, there are too few large earthquakes for saturation to be clearly observed, but the data at large magnitudes fit an empirical equation of shapeM = A + ( M max − A ) tanh ( C X − D )better than either the Gumbel I or III theory. This equation provides for a more sudden saturation than Gumbel's theory allows.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
