Abstract

Introduction: the paper examines some criminalistic aspects of prosecution, identifies certain trends, substantiates the fundamental part of the prosecutor’s office activities in criminal proceedings, and formulates proposals for improving law enforcement in general. Purpose: the substantiation of the statement on the necessity of using forensic recommendations in criminal proceedings in general, as well as the advisability of system criminalistic support for prosecution in particular. Methods: the methodological framework for the study consists of methods of scientific cognition, among which the main ones are the methods of analysis, consistency, synthesis, and comparative law. Results: the conclusion is formulated that the prosecutor’s office should delegate the coordination of the implementation of forensic recommendations at all stages of the criminal process and also assign the duty of enormous control over their implementation on an ongoing basis. Conclusions: based on the provisions outlined in the work, the author concludes about the absolute validity of the introduction and use of criminalistic categories in prosecution, regardless of the stages of the criminal process. It is concluded that the application of forensic recommendations will help eliminate certain difficulties in handling the prosecution, which will lead to a reduction in the number of violations.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.