Abstract

Two prominent representatives of the sexual emancipation movement in Germany, John Henry Mackay (1864–1933) and Magnus Hirschfeld (1868–1935) launched significant attacks on sexual binarism and its combinatories. Although Mackay defended the “nameless love” against seminal Christian and subsequent secularised misconstructions of its nature, he was unable to overcome the fundamental scheme of binomic sexuality. Hirschfeld, however, resolved the theoretical issue through his “doctrine of sexual intermediaries” (Zwischenstufenlehre)which purports that-without exception-all human beings are intersexual variants, i.e., unique composites of different proportions of masculinity and femininity. Since these proportions vary from one sexual layer of description to another in the same individual and can alter or be altered in time, it is sensu strictonot possible to postulate discrete sexual categories. Hirschfeld's “doctrine” implies a radical deconstruction of not only binomic sexuality but its supplementation through a “third sex.” It offers a meta-theoretical framework for rethinking sexual difference beyond the fictional schemes and categorial closures of Western traditions of sexual identity. His assumption of potentially infinite sexualities anticipates some of the basic tenets forwarded by the philosophical and political agendas of queer Studies.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.