Abstract
The position paper highlights the range of concerns that are engulfed in the injunction of explainable artificial intelligence in art (XAIxArt). Through a series of quick sub-questions, it points towards the ambiguities concerning 'explanation' and the postpositivist tradition of 'relevant explanation'. Rejecting both 'explanation' and 'relevant explanation', the paper takes a stance that XAIxArt is a symptom of insecurity of the anthropocentric notion of art and a nostalgic desire to return to outmoded notions of authorship and human agency. To justify this stance, the paper makes a distinction between an ornamentation model of explanation to a model of explanation as sense-making.
Full Text
Topics from this Paper
Relevant Explanation
Explainable Artificial Intelligence
Nostalgic Desire
Position Paper
Artificial Intelligence
Create a personalized feed of these topics
Get StartedSimilar Papers
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
Mar 1, 2011
Expert Systems with Applications
Dec 1, 2022
Medical Physics
Dec 7, 2021
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice
May 26, 2023
SSRN Electronic Journal
Jan 1, 2021
Fertility and Sterility
Nov 1, 2020
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Feb 11, 2022
The Lancet Digital Health
Oct 1, 2019
Jan 1, 2023
IEEE Access
Jan 1, 2022
Patterns
Nov 1, 2021
IEEE Access
Jan 1, 2022
Fusion: Practice and Applications
Jan 1, 2021
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Jun 1, 2022