Abstract

This article provides an informal account of the experience of being replicated, with a summary of the original author’s earliest misgivings. It then identifies features of the third chapter of the book Science and Religion that may make it peculiarly resistant to replication. Then, the questions are addressed whether and how a replication itself should be replicated. Finally, the article provides reflection on the value of replication by responding to the earlier contributions led by Hans Van Eyghen and Rachel S. A. Pear in this thematic section.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.